Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston wrote:
...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
I can't spe
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:28 +0100, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
> the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
> has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
> The vote on shindig
i think everyone has a limited amount of time available and will focus
their energy where they think it matters. For me, that means that I
try to help 'my podlings' to the best of my abilities and only get
involved in others when I have 'nothing better to do'. Your primary
source of support are the
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Ian Boston wrote:
> ...If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on
> this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing
> another release and wasting the IPMC's time...
I can't speak for others, but for me it's be
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:28, Ian Boston wrote:
> Hi,
> This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the
> necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1
> +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on
> shindig-dev resul
Hi,
This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received
the necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There
has been 1 +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes.
The vote on shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's
Votes so
