Voting is now closed and the voting for "Metron_0.1BETA Release Candidate 7”
passed.
3 binding +1 votes from IPMC members.
There are no 0 or -1 votes.
Votes:
+1 Taylor Goetz(binding) (IPMC)
+1 Billie Rinaldi(binding) (IPMC)
+1 Owen O'Malley (binding) (IPMC)
Thanks everyone for voting! We will
I checked:
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE looks good
- LICENSE looks good (see notes below)
- signature is valid
- Apache license headers in source files (see notes below)
NOTES:
- In the LICENSE file, you don’t need to include the entire content of the
Mozilla Public License, the following text
+1
- md5 checksum and signature are correct
- disclaimer is there
- great job on the license and notice
- tarball matches the tag
- build is successful
Things to fix before the next release:
* in the "Copyright (c) , ()" part of
the SIL Open Font License, I suspect the actual copyright holder
inf
+1 on the release.
I tested:
* The SHA and MD5 checksums are correct.
* The GPG signature is correct.
* The metron-streaming module builds and the unit tests pass.
* The LICENSE and NOTICE file look correct.
Things that should be improved before the next release:
* The top level pom.xml
On 04/07/2016 08:59 PM, Casey Stella wrote:
> Sorry, wrong quote:
>
> For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at
>> runtime in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and
>> unlikely to be changed anyway (say, by virtue of being specified by a
>> stand
Daniel,
MPL isn't explicitly restricted. see [1]. It looks like the podling has
properly cited it, see [2]. This does generally say that you cannot
include in a source release.
[1]: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
[2]: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/blob/maste
Sorry, wrong quote:
For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at
> runtime in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and
> unlikely to be changed anyway (say, by virtue of being specified by a
> standard), inclusion of appropriately labeled source is al
Hey Daniel,
Thanks for looking at it. Yes, that reference file is licensed under MPL
and as per the instructions at
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b:
> By attaching an appropriate and prominent label to the distribution, and
> requiring an explicit action by the user to get t
I ran it through my usual compliance check, which yielded:
Non-compliant license (Mozilla Public License/2.0) found in
incubator-metron-Metron_0.1BETA_rc7/metron-streaming/Metron-Common/src/test/resources/effective_tld_names.dat
Non-compliant license (Mozilla Public License/2.0) found in
This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.1BETA-RC7
Full list of changes in this release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/metron/0.1BETA-RC7-incubating/CHANGES
The tag/commit to be voted upon is Metron_0.1BETA_rc7:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-me
10 matches
Mail list logo
