[RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling)

2017-06-22 Thread John D. Ament
With 5 +1 binding and 1 +1 the vote to retire Blur has passed, in addition to the 3 binding votes on the dev list. I'll begin the process in coming days. John On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:30 PM John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > in

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-21 Thread Pierre Smits
+1. I concur, though I feel a bit saddened that it work out. Best regards, Pierre On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 for retirement > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > All, > > > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 for retirement On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 6:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is > mutually felt that it is time to retire Blur. There was a successful vote

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread Ted Dunning
+1 Live Taylor's comment about how this is just a one outcome for incubation, neither here nor there, not better or worse. On Jun 18, 2017 12:40, "P. Taylor Goetz" wrote: > +1 with a reminder that retiring is not a failure, just another path out > of the Incubator. > > -Taylor > > > > > On Ju

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 with a reminder that retiring is not a failure, just another path out of the Incubator. -Taylor > On Jun 18, 2017, at 12:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a communit

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread Raphael Bircher
The blur community vote was really clear. My +1 (binding) here. Am .06.2017, 18:30 Uhr, schrieb John D. Ament : All, This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is mutually felt that it is time to retire Bl

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 On Sunday, June 18, 2017, Craig Russell wrote: > +1 > > Craig > > > On Jun 18, 2017, at 9:30 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > > incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is > > mutually

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread Craig Russell
+1 Craig > On Jun 18, 2017, at 9:30 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > All, > > This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been > incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is > mutually felt that it is time to retire Blur. There was a successful vote > on th

[VOTE] Retire the Blur Podling

2017-06-18 Thread John D. Ament
All, This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is mutually felt that it is time to retire Blur. There was a successful vote on the podling's dev list at [1]. I'm now calling for the Incubator vote on the sam