[Result] [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

Vote passes with 3 +1 binding votes: - Taylor Goetz - Billie Rinaldi - Josh Elser And One non-binding vote - Debo Dutta Thanks to everyone who voted James On 8/17/16, 9:39 AM, "Josh Elser" wrote: >Casey, > >Thanks so much for the quick turn-around on JIRA issues. Great to see :) > >Re:

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

Casey, Thanks so much for the quick turn-around on JIRA issues. Great to see :) Re: findbug's jsr305 jar, yup, that is precisely the confusion I have with it. I would encourage use of https://github.com/stephenc/findbugs-annotations/ just to avoid any potential issues. This person has done a

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

Josh, You are of course correct on all points. - We neglected to be careful about the implications of binary bundling and transitive dependencies (JIRA ). - It's a good idea to use ephemeral ports on our integration test components

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 with reservations (binding) * DISCLAIMER present * LICENSE/NOTICE seem reasonable * xsums/sigs OK * Can build from source * Unit tests pass (after I stopped my local hbase instance, maybe you could use random ports from the ephemeral range for your test services instead of the default servic

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

Thanks Billie and Taylor, We've got https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-297 opened to address this. Thanks again, -David.. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked: > - signatures > - “incubating” in filename > - ALv2 license headers > - bui

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 (binding) Checked: - signatures - “incubating” in filename - ALv2 license headers - build from source - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENCE and NOTICE look okay As Billie mentioned, the license issue for the STIX extractor code still needs to be addressed. Can you add a lira for that and correct it i

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 binding verified signatures and checksums file name contains incubating disclaimer is correct L&N look good tarball matches the tag build successful For the next release, please look into the issue that Justin brought up on RC2: "For the license I think this file [1] may incorrectly have an apa

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:32 AM, James Sirota wrote: > > This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file was > removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general boards. > We no longer use it so we just removed it. > > This is a c

[VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3

This release is exactly the same as RC2, but the Mozilla licensed file was removed so it doesn’t cause problems for us on the incubator general boards. We no longer use it so we just removed it. This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC3 incubating Full list of changes in t