[RESULT][VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-14 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
Thanks everyone for your input and guidance in getting Wink 1.1 released! I appreciate your help! The vote is successful with the following binding +1 IPMC votes: Davanum Srinivas +1 Kevan Miller +1 Ant Elder +1 There were 0 neutral and 0 negative votes. I'll send out the official announcement

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-14 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
(sorry if you get this twice - I sent the original from an unsubscribed email address) Thanks everyone for your input and guidance in getting Wink 1.1 released! I appreciate your help! The vote is successful with the following binding +1 IPMC votes: Davanum Srinivas +1 Kevan Miller +1 Ant Elder

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-12 Thread sebb
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Thanks Sebb, > > Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all > back and restart the process. The missing AL headers would have been -1 from me, but as they cannot currently be fixed that can be left for a later release (if

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-12 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
Thanks Sebb, Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all back and restart the process. mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > > IPMCers, > > > > Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the w

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread ant elder
Looks ok to me, +1 ...ant On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > I should have mentioned this, > > Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from: > > Davanum Srinivas > Kevan Miller > > Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass. > > Thanks.

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread sebb
On 12/05/2010, sebb wrote: > On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > > > Sebb, > > > > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, > > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just > > confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # commen

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Sebb, > > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just > confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in > wink-common/src/main

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread Jason Dillon
On May 11, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, > the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just > confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in > wink-common/src/main/

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
Sebb, Sorry, I was incomplete in my explanation. Regarding the services files, the JAX-RS API jar is reading the first line in these files. I just confirmed it again in my build; if I add a # comment as the first line in wink-common/src/main/ resources/META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDe

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > Thanks Sebb for your review, > > I'll try to address each of your concerns: > > 1) AL headers are missing from... > > These files list implementation classes like other standard > META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write c

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
Thanks Sebb for your review, I'll try to address each of your concerns: 1) AL headers are missing from... These files list implementation classes like other standard META-INF/services/* files. We may be able to accommodate and re-write code that reads these files in the next release but I don'

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread sebb
Just tried building the source archive using mvn install. This reports a lot of warnings from the license:check goal. Seems unnecessary to include a license check in every build; it should probably be run as part of the site generation - if it is run automatically at all. Also, I got a test error

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread sebb
On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > IPMCers, > > Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. > I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the > process indicated here: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-

Re: [VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
I should have mentioned this, Wink 1.1 release already has two IPMC binding votes from: Davanum Srinivas Kevan Miller Wink 1.1. release needs only one more IPMC binding vote to pass. Thanks. mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Mike Rheinheimer wrote: > IPMCers, > > Wink 1.1 release voti

[VOTE] Release Wink 1.1 (incubating)

2010-05-11 Thread Mike Rheinheimer
IPMCers, Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the process indicated here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote The Maven staging area is