Thanks for the feedback Andrew. I will spin another candidate and call
a vote on that.
Thanks,
Arvind
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> fwiw, I really think
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1032should be addressed
> before 1.1.0 is released. The binary artifact
fwiw, I really think
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1032should be addressed
before 1.1.0 is released. The binary artifact, while
just a convenience artifact, is rather incorrect.
A.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Just to be clear, although the version number d
Just to be clear, although the version number doesn't indicate this the Flume
community considers this to be a beta release.
Ralph
On Mar 19, 2012, at 1:45 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version
> 1.1.0-incubating.
>
> *** Please cast your
This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version 1.1.0-incubating.
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The list of fixed issues:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc0/CHANGELOG
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc),
Please disregard this mail due to a typo in the text. Will be sending
out a new vote email shortly.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> 1.1.0-incuba
This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.1.0-incubating.
*** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours ***
The list of fixed issues:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flume/tags/flume-1.1.0-incubating-rc0/CHANGELOG
The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc),
