Hey Patrick,
We’ve already had two approved Incubator releases and gone through those items,
so is it possible to not block the release on this status page? It seems
orthogonal to having a release.
Matei
On Jan 30, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being u
t;general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Monday, January 27, 2014 12:02 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating (rc5)
>Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>(incubating) version 0.9.0.
>
>A
As usual, thanks for driving the release Patrick =)
- Henry
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 3 IPCM +1 votes and no 0
> or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
>
> +1:
> Matei Zaharia
> Andy Konwinski
> Henry Sapu
Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 3 IPCM +1 votes and no 0
or -1 votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
+1:
Matei Zaharia
Andy Konwinski
Henry Saputra*
Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
Patrick Wendell
Patrick Hunt*
0:
-1:
* = binding
Thanks to all those who voted.
- Patrick
On Thu, J
The status page is updated and it looks good to me.
+1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.9.0-incubating
Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran throug
Thanks for the reminder Patrick
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> -1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
> looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran through the release
> checklist which looks ok. If you fix the status I'll change my vote to
-1 due to the status page not being up to date. But otw the sig/xsums
looked good, RAT checked out clean and I ran through the release
checklist which looks ok. If you fix the status I'll change my vote to
+1.
A couple nits that I noticed (but not to hold a rel for):
* your notice files should be
Hi Patrick, prior to any incubator release you should ensure that your
status page is up to date. The "Project Setup" section in particular:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/spark.html
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following
+1 (binding)
Checked the legal files and signatures.
It looks good to me.
Regards
JB
On 01/27/2014 04:11 PM, Henry Saputra wrote:
NOTICE and LICENSE files look ok - good
Signatures and hashes are checked - good
No executable files in the source - good
Code compiled with sbt - good
+1 (bindin
NOTICE and LICENSE files look ok - good
Signatures and hashes are checked - good
No executable files in the source - good
Code compiled with sbt - good
+1 (binding)
- Henry
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spa
+1
On Jan 27, 2014 1:52 AM, "Matei Zaharia" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
>
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> > (incubating) version 0.9.0.
> >
> > A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC.
> >
> > The tag
+1
On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:02 AM, Patrick Wendell wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
> (incubating) version 0.9.0.
>
> A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC.
>
> The tag to be voted on is v0.9.0-incubating (commit 95d28ff3):
> https://git
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.9.0.
A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC.
The tag to be voted on is v0.9.0-incubating (commit 95d28ff3):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=95d28ff3d0d
13 matches
Mail list logo
