The vote passes with:
+1's
Andrew Purtell (binding)
John D. Ament (binding)
Luciano Resende (binding)
Pat Ferrel (non-binding)
No other votes.
RAT issues is tracked by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-62.
Thanks everyone!
Regards,
Donald
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Andrew Purt
No, you are free to make this release provided there is an issue tracking the
RAT check failures and a promise to fix them for the next release.
> On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
>
> Many thanks!
>
> I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which
Many thanks!
I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which
seems better in any case. These issues will be fixed asap in master and the
live site.
On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it.
+1
I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it.
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next
> release.
>
> Here is my +1 the .
>
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM John D. Ament
Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next
release.
Here is my +1 the .
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm
> the podling has it entered into their bug tracker. Then t
In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm
the podling has it entered into their bug tracker. Then they accept
the +1. We don't generally wait for a code change to be made, but would
block the next release if these issues are not addressed. I personally
want to u
I will too, and then you will have two binding votes in the affirmative.
> On Apr 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
>>
>> But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote?
>>
>
>> If it is, please vote -1, at
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote?
>
> If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and we thank
> you for being the one who took a look either way.
>
> We are just trying to move, out if possible or
But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote?
If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and we thank you
for being the one who took a look either way.
We are just trying to move, out if possible or iterate if not. These issues
have not changed from the curren
I would feel ok voting positively once these are fixed in master.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi Luciano,
>
> Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They are
> project build files and documentation.
>
> Regards,
> Donald
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 20
There have been no binding votes, thanks.
On Apr 22, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
How many binding votes do you need at this point?
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM Pat Ferrel wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt
> requir
How many binding votes do you need at this point?
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:34 PM Pat Ferrel wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt
> require licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we
> push to next release?
>
> Can
+1 non-binding
Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt require
licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we push to next
release?
Can other binding voters have a look? I know everyone is busy but hey, tax day
is past ;-)
On Apr 18, 2017, at 1
Hi Luciano,
Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They are
project build files and documentation.
Regards,
Donald
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The PredictionIO c
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be good
> for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the
> IPMC before a final official source-only release.
>
> Vote result on dev@:
>
Hi all,
This is a friendly reminder for the release voting of Apache PredictionIO
0.11.0-incubating-rc2. The voting will stay open until there are enough
votes for acceptance or rejection.
Regards,
Donald
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO comm
Hi all,
The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be good
for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the
IPMC before a final official source-only release.
Vote result on dev@:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/031ff6f98b3d5a54b716789bda50681a0
17 matches
Mail list logo
