The vote passes with:
+1's (all binding)
Andrew Purtell
Justin Mclean
Suneel Marthi
No other votes.
Thanks everyone!
Regards,
Donald
+1 binding
- Checked sums and signatures: ok
- Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE: present, properly formatted
- No binaries in the source release (except source image files)
- Compiled from source following the build instructions (8u102)
- Manually invoked Apache RAT using ./tests/.rat-excludes:
To clarify the only thing you will ever find in master is a set of commits
tagged as an RC or release, never the intermediate changes as in typical
master/snapshots.
On Oct 7, 2016, at 8:59 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache
p
What Donald said but also we use a slightly different process than most Apache
projects. Master is not a snapshot, we keep snapshots in the “develop” branch
until RCs start and they are the only contents of master ever—that is RCs or
releases. This process is not typical in Apache but I don’t th
Moving my vote from dev@
+1 binding
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked,
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
> - No unexpected binaries
> - All source files have ASF headers (although there a
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked,
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes correct
- LICENSE and NOTICE is fine
- No unexpected binaries
- All source files have ASF headers (although there are a large number of file
that could possible have headers that don’t).
- Can compile from source
Very minor
Hi John,
Thanks for pointing out these issues.
For the README issue, I have filed a ticket at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-39.
For the installation instructions, those are intended for pre-ASF releases.
We do not yet have any ASF releases so we can't tell people where to
download on
Your website tells people to checkout your master branch to build from
source. This is a big no-no from an ASF standpoint. Snapshot builds
should only be for developer use.
CAn you double check your README files, missing headers.
John
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:01 PM Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi a
I'll second the second. Please and thank you to "binding" eyes on this
release.
+1 [non-binding]
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> I’ll second the ping and since I’m much less polite than Donald I’d like
> to add that there are PRs and branches to be merged from a number of pe
I’ll second the ping and since I’m much less polite than Donald I’d like to add
that there are PRs and branches to be merged from a number of people that want
to contribute. A release would be a shot in the arm to our growing community.
Lots of good work is waiting on the vote.
+1 [non-binding]
Dear IPMC,
This is a friendly reminder that the vote is closing in 24 hours. Would
highly appreciate any feedback to this release candidate.
Regards,
Donald
On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Donald Szeto wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.10.0-incubating-rc5 to be good
Hi all,
The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.10.0-incubating-rc5 to be good
for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the
IPMC before a final official source-only release.
Vote result on dev@:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-predictionio-dev/20
12 matches
Mail list logo
