[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-29 Thread Donald Szeto
Thank you for pointing out all issues. I have not received a reply from the photographer, so I will cancel this vote and roll a new RC. Thanks! Regards, Donald On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-27 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Sounds good. Since a vote usually take 72 hours, is it okay in practice to > "pipeline them"? What I mean is to let the current IPMC vote sits here, > while the project PMC creates a new RC and start voting on it? Or must they >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-27 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi Justin, Sounds good. Since a vote usually take 72 hours, is it okay in practice to "pipeline them"? What I mean is to let the current IPMC vote sits here, while the project PMC creates a new RC and start voting on it? Or must they be mutually exclusive, i.e. only one could exist at any time? I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Meanwhile, if we want to fix it by unbundling the photos (which are > jCarousel examples that do not affect its functionality), do we need to go > through another round of PredictionIO voting before coming back to IPMC? Yes that is needed, but given the changes are minimal it should be easy

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-27 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi Justin, Thank you so much for your detailed review! I am clarifying the redistribution rights with the photographer. Meanwhile, if we want to fix it by unbundling the photos (which are jCarousel examples that do not affect its functionality), do we need to go through another round of Predictio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Sorry -1 binding as the release is likely to contain photographs we don’t have permission to distribute. Happy to change my vote to +1 if it’s shown we do have permission to do so. Most of the other issues are minor (for a first release) and could be fixed next release if the above is not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Just doing review and is the doc directory meant to be included in the source release? I’m seeing a number of pieces of 3rd party licensed code bundled in there that’s not mentioned in LICENSE. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscri

[VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4

2016-09-26 Thread Donald Szeto
Hi all, The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.10.0-incubating-rc4 to be good for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for the IPMC before a final official source-only release. Vote result on dev@: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-predictionio-dev/20