FYI - I prepared a patch "Mention that there is no implicit +1 in
votes" [1] to include this information.
Feel free to give it a review and improve the expression.
Best,
tison.
[1] https://github.com/apache/www-site/pull/338
Ayush Saxena 于2024年1月9日周二 20:56写道：
>
> > I may prepare a patch on
> h
> Thanks Tison for the suggestion about the release notes. I think that is
something we can use.
I think it's a good idea to mention this in Pekko's release process
On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 8:50 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Thanks Tison for the suggestion about the release notes. I think that is
> some
> I may prepare a patch on
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html to mention this
explicitly.
Still doing this would be helpful & maybe an explicit line in the
package release section as well [1], that a RM "can" vote as well, I
have seen couple of folks with this confusion that since you c
Aha. I saw "Here is my +1 (binding)." at the bottom of the first mail now >_<
Best,
tison.
PJ Fanning 于2024年1月8日周一 18:15写道：
>
> Thanks Tison for checking. I did vote on the initial email.
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 11:10, tison
Thanks Tison for checking. I did vote on the initial email.
https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 11:10, tison wrote:
>
> Hi PJ,
>
> Congrats.
>
> I was told that the RM who drives the release doesn't implicitly vote
> a +1. So you'd better cast y
Hi PJ,
Congrats.
I was told that the RM who drives the release doesn't implicitly vote
a +1. So you'd better cast your own +1 the next time when running a
release.
But I don't find a policy sentence to mention it. While I think the
argument is valid, I may prepare a patch on
https://www.apache.o
The vote passes with 3 +1s and no negative votes. All votes were binding.
Vote Thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread/og2mtjv4nsgrh1mc96cfxbqzz8poysp8
Votes
Zili Chen (tison)
Matthew de Detrich
PJ Fanning
I will proceed with the release and make the announcements.
Thanks to everyone who partici
Thanks Tison for the suggestion about the release notes. I think that is
something we can use.
On 2024/01/08 06:12:42 tison wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> I checked
>
> + Download links valid
> + Checksum and signature matches
> + NOTICE and LICENSE present
> + DISCLAIMER present
> + No unexpected bi
+1 binding
I checked
+ Download links valid
+ Checksum and signature matches
+ NOTICE and LICENSE present
+ DISCLAIMER present
+ No unexpected binaries
+ Can compile from source with `sbt compile` on Darwin Kernel Version
22.5.0 ARM64
One suggestion:
Perhaps you should stage the release note as
Carrying over +1 from
https://lists.apache.org/thread/txbp6w48yv2kmjwozrmdg0ltlxcjl8jj
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:46 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hello Incubator Community,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
> gRPC version 1.0.2-RC1.
>
> The discussion thread:
> https://l
Hello Incubator Community,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pekko(incubating)
gRPC version 1.0.2-RC1.
The discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/dmz52zk06byjy389f4qcrl7y9n0h00by
Pekko PPMC Vote Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7yfn04qlg7kcjrmx2dyosrrthj0qvnqf
Pekko
11 matches
Mail list logo
