I'll remember that for the next release. Thanks for the clarification!
Matthieu
On 5/28/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE
file
> should contain details o
On 5/18/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've posted a new RC addressing all the issues you've mentioned. The only
gotcha is with the SQL files, these come from Quartz (Open Symphony project,
Apache 2.0 license). So for these I've just added a short note pointing to
the NOTICE, which
On 5/28/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file
should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is
not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which
the component is distrib
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file
should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is
not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which
the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file."
See
I've looked at a lot of releases before preparing this one, including Axis2,
and having the licenses for each dependency doesn't seem to be a requirement
(both for incubator and non incubator releases). The point, I think, is to
mention all dependencies with specific copyrights in the NOTICE file.
Overall looks fine to me but one question: at least in Axis2 releases we
include the licenses for all the dependent stuff- for example for the
backport-concurrent stuff. If you take a look at the axis2 distro you'll
see a .license file for every external dependency in the lib/ directory.
If th
+1 from me!
Paul
On 5/22/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me? (or did i vote before :)
-- dims
On 5/21/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All the listed issues have been solved for a few days now. Robert mentioned
> being offline this week so could somebody
+1 from me? (or did i vote before :)
-- dims
On 5/21/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All the listed issues have been solved for a few days now. Robert mentioned
being offline this week so could somebody else pick this up? We still need 2
IPMC votes for this release.
Thanks!
Matthi
All the listed issues have been solved for a few days now. Robert mentioned
being offline this week so could somebody else pick this up? We still need 2
IPMC votes for this release.
Thanks!
Matthieu
On 5/17/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've posted a new RC addressing all the is
I've posted a new RC addressing all the issues you've mentioned. The only
gotcha is with the SQL files, these come from Quartz (Open Symphony project,
Apache 2.0 license). So for these I've just added a short note pointing to
the NOTICE, which mentions the license and copyright. Hope this is enoug
On 5/15/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ODE community held a vote for its first incubator release. See [1] for
the tally of 6 +1s (including one mentor vote) and no 0 or -1s. We're now
asking for a vote by the incubator PMC to authorize the publication of our
1.0 release.
The re
The ODE community held a vote for its first incubator release. See [1] for
the tally of 6 +1s (including one mentor vote) and no 0 or -1s. We're now
asking for a vote by the incubator PMC to authorize the publication of our
1.0 release.
The release consists of 3 different artifacts:
- A WAR-base
12 matches
Mail list logo
