Hi,
> There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC
> votes from the podling dev list. And let's consider why -- is there
> really a benefit to having IPMC members cast votes twice
Yes it’s then clear on the this list how many +1 votes there currently is
before the resul
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:53 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
> > From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I
> could
> > be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list
> > altogether if they ha
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could
> be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list
> altogether if they had 3 +1 votes on the dev list. IMO It’s not exactly hard
> for IPMC mem
Hi,
> This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on
> the dev lists automatically transferred.
From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could be
wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list altogether
if they had 3
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the
> incubator PMC are binding.
Hi Justin,
There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC
votes from the podling dev list. And let's con
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the
> incubator PMC are binding.
>
This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on
the dev lists automatically transferred.
>
> Thank
Hi,
No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the
incubator PMC are binding.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-
The vote for releasing Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating) passed
with 5 binding "+1" votes, and no "0" or "-1" votes.
Binding votes:
Jacopo Cappellato +1
Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1
John D. Ament +1
Justin Mclean +1
Sergio Fernández +1 (voted on d...@freemarker.incubator.apache.org only)
Hi,
Changing my vote to:
+1 (binding)
> You mean src/main/misc/overloadedNumberRules/prices.ods and
> src/manual/en_US/docgen-originals/figures/overview.odg? As they don't
> have copyright headers (because they are binaries), I thought I have
> to indicate their license somewhere.
The LICENSE f
For completeness, here's the links to Tomcat's copy of the DTD files
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_3.dtd
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd
https://github.com/apache/tomcat80/blob/trunk/j
Friday, March 25, 2016, 10:54:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) due to category B license in source.
I believe they are under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and so
aren't category B, but see later.
> As these file are
> mention in NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but
Hi,
> Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
The binary files are OKish. It's more the license I’m concerned about - do we
know the history / what’s going on there?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscri
Would you be comfortable for letting this be fixed next release Justin?
I raised this on the dev list when the vote came up -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C601980662.20160322084059%40freemail.hu%3E
John
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:54 PM Justin Mcl
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to category B license in source. As these file are mention in
NOTICE there’s probably a reason for this but it’s unclear to me.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures good but form a non apache email
- LICENSE is good
- NOTICE has unneeded information in it
- DISCLAIME
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Jacopo Cappellato
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 03/25/2016 12:07 AM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C42
Copying my +1 (binding) vote from the dev@ list here.
Release contents look good.
John
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:07 PM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
>
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201603.mbox/%3C425840806.20160321000209%40freemail.hu%3E
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-ar
18 matches
Mail list logo
