Francis De Brabandere schrieb am 13.09.2009 20:38:26:
> ...
> the keys on the website points to
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/empire-db/KEYS
> I suggest it points to a location in the repo where it is kept so we
> don't have to update two copies each time.
I am not sure this is feasible
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> I added myself a while ago to the keys in our
> repo/trunk/tools/KEYS.txt. Should we move that file to trunk and
> publish it in the dist?
I would say so. The advantage of having the KEYS file also in the
/dist/ is that it'll be clos
The jar diff is discussed in an other thread.
Added myself to the site:
http://incubator.apache.org/empire-db/community/contributors.htm
meanwhile I created this document on the wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Becoming+part+of+the+team
(just as a start)
the keys on the w
I have checked the release and I have found the following issues:
- jar files in the maven2 repo and the distribution differ. No idea how
this can happen. (see below))
- francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see below))
Everything else looks good, except the issues sebb found.
On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module:
>
>
>
>
>
>maven-deploy-plugin
>
I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module:
maven-deploy-plugin
true
On 12/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging
> repo) as they have no real value.
>
> Would you agree with that?
OK by me.
It also seems wrong to publish some content only via Maven.
I would expect to see all the Maven conten
Let's say we do not publish the war's (remove them from the staging
repo) as they have no real value.
Would you agree with that?
Thanks,
Francis
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:41 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabander
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> > wrote:
> > [X] -1
>
> Distribution archives are broken.
> >>>
> >>> Maven artifacts don't have
you please re-check and give me some details about where those
> differences and those files are?
Sorry, my bad - was looking at an old copy of the expanded archives;
current ones look OK.
> Thanks
> Rainer
>
>
> Sebb wrote:
> > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empir
On 11/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> >> Distribution files are located here
> >> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
> >
> > The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
>
>
> I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
>
> >
> > The
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>
> Hi Rainer,
>
> > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains
> 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and
> conte
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
> wrote:
> [X] -1
Distribution archives are broken.
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>>
>> That war contains jar's that each contain their
Hi Rainer,
> The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains 5
> empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and content
> of the files do match.
could you tell me which ones those are?
>
> Also I could not find any raw class files or eclipse proj
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Francis De Brabandere
wrote:
>>> > [X] -1
>>>
>>> Distribution archives are broken.
>>
>> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
>
> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L?
>> > [X] -1
>>
>> Distribution archives are broken.
>
> Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files.
That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and notice
files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want us
to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the fu
OTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>
> On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and
> is
> > > now looking
>> Distribution files are located here
>> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/
>
> The tar.gz and .zip files have different contents.
I did a diff on both archives after extraction and they seem to be equal.
>
> They both look completely wrong to me, as they contain raw class files
>
On 11/09/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> > now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> > previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a f
On 08/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
> now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
> previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release
> candidate.
>
> These are the
's list?
-Bertrand
> Francis De Brabandere wrote:
>> re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
>> now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the releas
+1 (non-binding unfortunately).
Any IPMC members willing to have a look at this release?
Thanks,
Rainer
Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)
>
> Hi,
>
> The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and i
Hi,
The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is
now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. Since our
previous attempt failed on general@ we prepared a fifth release
candidate.
These are the major change from our previous 2.0.4 release:
- Maven project m
23 matches
Mail list logo
