Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-13 Thread James Strachan
On 6/12/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/12/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Passed with +1s from jstrachan, jim, jvanzyl, brianm and no -1s. i'm still a bit concerned about potential legal issues if the uber is distributed through the maven repository

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-12 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/12/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Passed with +1s from jstrachan, jim, jvanzyl, brianm and no -1s. i'm still a bit concerned about potential legal issues if the uber is distributed through the maven repository but it's this release has been held up far too long already...

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-12 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
+1 from me as well. Sorry. geir James Strachan wrote: > Passed with +1s from jstrachan, jim, jvanzyl, brianm and no -1s. > > Many thanks to all those who responded to the plethora of emails to > get the release distro into good shape :) > > On 6/5/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-12 Thread James Strachan
Passed with +1s from jstrachan, jim, jvanzyl, brianm and no -1s. Many thanks to all those who responded to the plethora of emails to get the release distro into good shape :) On 6/5/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-08 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 5 Jun 06, at 10:46 AM 5 Jun 06, James Strachan wrote: We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro to avoid confusion (as most In

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-08 Thread Brian McCallister
+1 -Brian On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:46 AM, James Strachan wrote: We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro to avoid confusion (as most I

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-06 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/5/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, The incubator-activemq-4.0.jar is an uber jar that is built by aggregating the activemq broker, client and a few dependency jars like derby. I think derby is where IBM reference comes from and also explains the multiple copies of t

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-05 Thread Hiram Chirino
Hi Robert, The incubator-activemq-4.0.jar is an uber jar that is built by aggregating the activemq broker, client and a few dependency jars like derby. I think derby is where IBM reference comes from and also explains the multiple copies of the same file thing (different jars were using differen

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-05 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 6/5/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro to avoid confusion (as most Incubator

[VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release (new binary)

2006-06-05 Thread James Strachan
We ended up recutting the binary of the 4.0 release of ActiveMQ to address a few issues brought up in the Incubator PMC vote; I'd just like to call another vote to explicitly approve the new binary distro to avoid confusion (as most Incubator PMC folks voted on the previous binary). Can I ask the