Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

2003-11-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 26, 2003, at 5:48 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Since the "repo" moniker has a bad connotation to some, given that this is meant to be an implamantation of the repository effort, and since Rupert is too common in google, I change the proposed name to Ruper (for what it's worth). Others

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

2003-11-26 Thread Leo Simons
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Other votes? +1, generally agreeing with all other comments made so far. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

2003-11-26 Thread Berin Lautenbach
+1 (Still curious about project Wonka) Cheers, Berin Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Since the "repo" moniker has a bad connotation to some, given that this is meant to be an implamantation of the repository effort, and since Rupert is too common in google, I change the proposed name to Ruper

[VOTE] Incubate Apache Ruper (was about Repo)

2003-11-26 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Since the "repo" moniker has a bad connotation to some, given that this is meant to be an implamantation of the repository effort, and since Rupert is too common in google, I change the proposed name to Ruper (for what it's worth). Others have asked to be able to help, so the committers would p