Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-08 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 10/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now a practical question - what's involved in distributing the release? Anything beyond placing a copy to "people.apache.org:/www/ people.apache.org/dist/incubator/cayenne/" ??? AFAIK, no (i've never cut incubator releases so i hope that

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-05 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Brian McCallister's vote just came in, so it makes it 7 "+1", with 4 binding. Andrus On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Cayenne 2.0.1 release has been officially approved by the Incubator PMC (voting thread can be found here - [1]). We got 6 "+1" votes (of which 3 were b

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-05 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Cayenne 2.0.1 release has been officially approved by the Incubator PMC (voting thread can be found here - [1]). We got 6 "+1" votes (of which 3 were binding), and no other votes: Jean T. Anderson +1 Bill Dudney +1 Robert Burrell Donkin +1 Craig L Russell +1 Jim Jagielski +1 Andrus Adamchik +

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-05 Thread Brian McCallister
+1 -Brian On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne. This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license dependencies. Now we would

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
And here as well: +1 On Oct 5, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: We need one more vote from an Incubator PMC member... Or do we? Jim Jagielski voted +1 on the release already during the vote on cayenne-dev. Does that count? Andrus On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-05 Thread Andrus Adamchik
We need one more vote from an Incubator PMC member... Or do we? Jim Jagielski voted +1 on the release already during the vote on cayenne-dev. Does that count? Andrus On Oct 1, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I just posted the new release snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/~

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-04 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:32 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: (cayenne-2.0.1-incubating/doc/api/cayenne/apache-javadoc.css i think was missed) Oops - fixed that on the 2.0 branch and trunk. Thanks Andrus - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-03 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 10/1/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just posted the new release snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ +1 (cayenne-2.0.1-incubating/doc/api/cayenne/apache-javadoc.css i think was missed) - robert --

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-03 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Andrus, +1 for release. I can now see your key, and can verify the signature on the release artifact (for MacOSX). Thanks, Craig On Oct 3, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I can swear I did it before, but I posted it again a few minutes ago. Seems to be there now: http://pg

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-03 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I can swear I did it before, but I posted it again a few minutes ago. Seems to be there now: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Andrus+Adamchik&op=index Andrus On Oct 3, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Andrus, Congratulations on your release candidate. I was unable t

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-03 Thread Craig L Russell
Hi Andrus, Congratulations on your release candidate. I was unable to retrieve your key B8AF90BF from the public key server pgp.mit.edu, which you used to sign the release. Have you had your key signed and uploaded it to a public server? Craig On Sep 30, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-03 Thread Bill Dudney
+1 -bd- On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I just posted the new release snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ The changes from the first attempt are: * Added license headers to the .dtd and .css files in the documentation. * Added license head

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-02 Thread Jean T. Anderson
This looks good to me. +1 -jean Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I just posted the new release snapshots here: > > http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ > > The changes from the first attempt are: > > * Added license headers to the .dtd and .css files in the documentation. > * Added lic

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I just posted the new release snapshots here: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ The changes from the first attempt are: * Added license headers to the .dtd and .css files in the documentation. * Added license headers to the tutorial Java files that are changeable by users. *

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 10/1/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > for example http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/ > tags/2.0.1/cayenne/tutorials/quick-start/cayenne-tutorial/src/ > cayenne/tutorial/Artist.java > looked to me li

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Oct 1, 2006, at 2:42 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: for example http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/ tags/2.0.1/cayenne/tutorials/quick-start/cayenne-tutorial/src/ cayenne/tutorial/Artist.java looked to me like an example of a hand-crafted subclass. This one was gene

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 10/1/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:57 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > oh yes: the LICENSE and NOTICE files are ok but the LICENSE file could > be improved by including an indication about to which artifact or > source file the particular l

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Hi Robert, On Oct 1, 2006, at 12:57 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote: oh yes: the LICENSE and NOTICE files are ok but the LICENSE file could be improved by including an indication about to which artifact or source file the particular license applies. I guess then it would duplicate NOTICE file

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/30/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne. This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license dependencies. Now we would like to request

Re: [VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-10-01 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 9/30/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne. This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license dependencies. Now we would like to request

[VOTE] Approve the 2.0.1 release of Cayenne

2006-09-30 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Cayenne community has voted and approved 2.0.1 release of Cayenne. This release marks a major milestone in Cayenne incubation as we've fully resolved all IP issues and got rid of incompatible license dependencies. Now we would like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC to perform the