On Nov 28, 2007 6:49 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > IMHO this involves both a wider and narrower issue
> >
> > 1. for this narrow issue, approval has already been given. insisting
> > that mentors in particular p
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:49 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Nov 22, 2007 6:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy c
On Nov 22, 2007 6:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
>
> Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
> discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that "infrastructure
> approval sho
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that
"infrastructure
approval should probably rest
> Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy
Discussion to what? I see the RAT set up thread, but there was no
discussion of a general policy change. Robert said that "infrastructure
approval should probably rest with the IPMC in general rather than the
mentors specifical
Hi,
+1 to decentralizing where possible. Keep in mind Robert and RAT are
a fairly unique podling situation, so this policy change is largely
theoretical, I don't think it will affect many people in practice.
Yoav
On Nov 22, 2007 6:51 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Nov
Hi,
On Nov 22, 2007 3:03 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
> I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
-0
I think it's valuable to document wh
On Nov 22, 2007 2:03 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up their own infrastructure
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
+1 (non binding)
Gilles
2007/11/22, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
> I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
>
> [ ] +1 Allow podlings with karm
See Robert's message earlier in which he asked if he could set up the
RAT project even though he's not a Mentor on RAT.
He's not a Mentor, but he has all the karma anyone would want.
Craig
On Nov 21, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL
On Nov 21, 2007 5:03 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
> I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
> issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
>
> [ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up
Since there has been no discussion, and this is a change to policy,
I'd like to formally propose adopting the policy change in https://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-71
[ ] +1 Allow podlings with karma to set up their own infrastructure
[ ] -1 Require a Mentor to set up infrastructur
12 matches
Mail list logo
