+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/founda
+1 (binding)
On Nov 22, 2016 21:44, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> Le 17 nov. 2016 16:23, "Sam Ruby" a écrit :
> >
> > Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> > down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> > Apache Incubator
>
> +1, bindin
Le 17 nov. 2016 16:23, "Sam Ruby" a écrit :
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> Apache Incubator
+1, binding.
- Bertrand
+1
regards,
Karl
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/fo
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:34 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hey Sam,
>
> I don't think the discussion died down. Questions were asked. I'm not
> sure we got answers.
>
> At this point, I'm +1 to accept OpenWhisk. I'm not going to block
> OpenWhisk, I am going to work on the assumption
Hey Sam,
I don't think the discussion died down. Questions were asked. I'm not
sure we got answers.
At this point, I'm +1 to accept OpenWhisk. I'm not going to block
OpenWhisk, I am going to work on the assumption that our current git
requirements are met (apache is the canonical repository).
+1
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Reynold Xin wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> > Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> > down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> > Apache Incubator.
> >
> > The A
+1
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
>http://www.apache.org/foundation/votin
+1
On 11/17/16, 7:22 AM, "sa3r...@gmail.com on behalf of Sam Ruby"
wrote:
>Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
>down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
>Apache Incubator.
>
>The ASF voting rules are described at:
> http://www.apache.
+1 (binding)
Good luck !
If you need any help, please let me know.
Regards
JB
On 11/17/2016 04:22 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
Apache Incubator.
The ASF voting rules are
+1
On 17 November 2016 at 21:08, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
> > Am 17.11.2016 um 07:22 schrieb Sam Ruby :
> >
> > Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> > down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> > Apache Incubator
+1
Regards
Felix
> Am 17.11.2016 um 07:22 schrieb Sam Ruby :
>
> Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
> down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
> Apache Incubator.
>
> The ASF voting rules are described at:
> http://www.apache.org/founda
+1(non-binding)
Regards
Liang
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-OpenWhisk-into-the-Apache-Incubator-tp52505p52506.html
Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Now that the discussion thread on the OpenWhisk Proposal has died
down, please take a moment to vote on accepting OpenWhisk into the
Apache Incubator.
The ASF voting rules are described at:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
A vote for accepting a new Apache Incubator podling is a ma
14 matches
Mail list logo
