Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > ...I'll surely be cheering for DeviceMap going forward. It must be > excrutiating > to leave the OpenDDR resource data behind, but I'm glad that the podling will > be taking the high road and I believe that this decision will pay dividends

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-02 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Considering the various concerns expressed in this thread, along with > Marvin's very valid points about the difficulty in establishing > provenance of the original data, I don't feel good about accepting the > resources part of this don

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...Let's cancel this vote - I'll remove the mention of > OpenDDR-Resources_1.0.0.10.zip from [1] and start a standard lazy > consensus IP clearance with the rest As the donation was mentioned in the DeviceMap incubation proposal [1]

[CANCELED] [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > ...I'd like > Incubator PMC members to vote as follows: > > [ ] +1, accept the OpenDDR donation including the > OpenDDR-Resources_1.0.0.10.zip data > [ ] -1, do not accept the OpenDDR-Resources_1.0.0.10.zip (but the > other parts are ok

Re: [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-01 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Ok, fair enough. My goal was to make everyone aware of the nastiness surrounding wurfl.xml, and that goal is hereby achieved :) Now let's concentrate on the IP evaluation process. Here is my +1 for this vote. Andrus On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 20

Re: [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > I guess from our point of view the decision is whether the donation of > that data can be considered voluntary, as the ownership of the > original data is somewhat unclear. The header of the original data > file [2] states that "the inf

Re: [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-10-01 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Ok, fair enough. My goal was to make everyone aware of the nastiness surrounding wurfl.xml, and that goal is hereby achieved :) Now let's concentrate on the IP evaluation process. Here is my +1 for this vote. Andrus On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 201

Re: [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-09-28 Thread Benson Margulies
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Hi Bertrand, > > OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the > resource file will make it very useful immediately. > > Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml was clearly open source, > and I am going

Re: [VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-09-28 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Hi Bertrand, OpenDDR combining forces with DeviceMap is great news! And having the resource file will make it very useful immediately. Regarding this vote.. While the original wurfl.xml was clearly open source, and I am going to cast a positive vote to accept it in DeviceMap, I am fairly cert

[VOTE] [IP clearance] OpenDDR resources file donation to DeviceMap podling

2012-09-28 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, IP clearance usually works by lazy consensus, but in this case I'd like an explicit vote, as the donation described at [0] includes data that when hosted on Github has caused a DMCA takedown request [1] to which OpenDDR responded [2]. I guess from our point of view the decision is whether the