Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-07 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:42 AM, David Jencks wrote: > +1 (not yet binding?) > > thanks > david jencks > > On May 4, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > > > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored > by > > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" p

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-07 Thread David Jencks
+1 (not yet binding?) thanks david jencks On May 4, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upc

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-06 Thread Brian McCallister
Gianni > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:48:46 AM > Subject: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator > > > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a ... > ---

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 (binding ) sent from my Android phone Am 06.05.2010 07:57 schrieb "Gurkan Erdogdu" : +1 --Gurkan From: Simone Gianni To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:48:46 AM Subject: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator I would like

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu
+1 --Gurkan From: Simone Gianni To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Wed, May 5, 2010 1:48:46 AM Subject: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new "

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Kevan Miller
+1 (binding) --kevan On May 4, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > i

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
+1 obviously. :-) -h On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:48, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API an

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Reinhard Pötz
Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > implementation > > The proposal is available on the

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1, cool guys! Cheers, Chris On 5/5/10 12:20 PM, "Gianugo Rabellino" wrote: On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > aro

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > implementation +1

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 Craig On May 4, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and implementation

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > impleme

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Niklas Gustavsson
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. +1 (non-binding), very interesting project, hoping to lurk around. /niklas --

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote: > [X] +1  to accept Amber into the Incubator -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incuba

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 05/05/2010 12:48 AM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > implementation > > The prop

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread Luciano Resende
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and > implementation > >

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread Upayavira
+1 Upayavira On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 00:48 +0200, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and >

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread Francis De Brabandere
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Paul Lindner wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > >> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored >> by >> the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling.  The goal is to buil

Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread Paul Lindner
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored > by > the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a > community > around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API an

[VOTE][PROPOSAL] Amber incubator

2010-05-04 Thread Simone Gianni
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by the Shindig PMC for a new "Amber" podling. The goal is to build a community around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and implementation The proposal is available on the wiki at and included below: htt