On 15 February 2012 07:42, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> wrote:
>> Hi Roman,
>> we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
>> point me to some written docs?
>
> AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apach
Thank you very much for your comment Roman. I didn't know that we're causing
you problems by using different naming convention than other hadoop related
projects.
I've filled JIRA SQOOP-439 to make this change happen.
Jarcec
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:42:20PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> H
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
> point me to some written docs?
AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apache, in general, is all
about source releases. The binary artifacts
Hi Roman,
we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you
point me to some written docs?
We're currently appending "-src" postfix to stress out that it's only source
artifact whereas other artifacts also contains binaries.
Jarcec
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:27:35PM
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote):
> Tom White
> Patrick Hunt
> Olivier Lamy (dev list vote)
>
> Thanks for everyone who has reviewed and voted!
>
> There was one note with slightly outdated ye
The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote):
Tom White
Patrick Hunt
Olivier Lamy (dev list vote)
Thanks for everyone who has reviewed and voted!
There was one note with slightly outdated year in one license that will be
addressed in next release. I will continue
