My apologies.
Hal
> -Original Message-
> From: Colm O hEigeartaigh [mailto:cohei...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 11:10 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
>
> It will be cool to see a XA
o start
> > with "[DISCUSS]"? Or should I simply reference the wiki page?
> >
> > Hal
> >
> > > -Original Message-----
> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:john.d.am...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 5:03 PM
> > >
gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 8:59 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
> >
> > I think so.
> >
> > There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people
> >
4 8:59 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
>
> I think so.
>
> There's a few things that you want to iron out first, before people
> start voting on this.
>
> - 3 is generally the "minimum" num
want me to repost the proposal with the Subject changed to start
> with "[DISCUSS]"? Or should I simply reference the wiki page?
>
> Hal
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:john.d.am...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 201
03 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
>
> Hal,
>
> Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a
> [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a
> vote or something.
>
> J
I was unclear on how much to assume the audience already knows about the
> subject.
>
> Hal
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:31 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.or
4 4:31 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
>
> Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other
> acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe you
> can rephrase it to more generic analo
4 5:03 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenAZ as new Incubator project
>
> Hal,
>
> Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a
> [DISCUSS] thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a
> vote or so
Hal,
Per customs, would you mind if we cancel this and start with a [DISCUSS]
thread about OpenAZ? It's unclear if you meant this to be a vote or
something.
John
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Hal Lockhart
wrote:
> Abstract
>
> OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the
It'e really unlikely I will be able to contribute in any way to this any time
soon, but I think it would be awesome if this was at apache. When I tried to
investigate xacml a few years ago the major stumbling block I found was not
being able to look at any reasonable implementation. (I rememb
Could you add more description on what is PEP and PDP and other
acronyms used in the proposal? If it is not directly relevant maybe
you can rephrase it to more generic analogy.
Thanks,
Henry
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Hal Lockhart wrote:
> Abstract
>
> OpenAz is a project to create tools
Abstract
OpenAz is a project to create tools and libraries to enable the development of
Attribute-based Access Control (ABAC) Systems in a variety of languages. In
general the work is at least consistent with or actually conformant to the
OASIS XACML Standard.
Proposal
Generally the work fall
13 matches
Mail list logo
