RE: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]

2007-04-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of > > > automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at > > > apachecon. > > We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, >

Re: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]

2007-04-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On 4/23/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...anyone know if david's going to be around at apachecon?.. He says not, http://www.david-reid.com/cynic/?p=532 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]

2007-04-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/23/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of > automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at > apachecon. We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, Mentors, proj

RE: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]

2007-04-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of > automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at > apachecon. We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, Mentors, projects, dates are all listed in multiple places. It seems

RE: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling

2007-04-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Shane Isbell wrote: > The project is going well and as such, should not be archived. > I have not reported for April since the NMaven schedule occurs > on the February, May, August, November schedule. This is one of those problems with maintaining consistency in redundant sets of meta-data. Accor

Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]

2007-04-23 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 4/23/07, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Noel, The project is going well and as such, should not be archived. I have not reported for April since the NMaven schedule occurs on the February, May, August, November schedule. if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack som

Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling

2007-04-23 Thread Shane Isbell
it be archived? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:25 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Shane Isbell Subject: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see &

RE: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling

2007-04-23 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Is this project going, or should it be archived? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:25 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Shane Isbell Subject: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to

[PROPOSAL] NMaven podling

2006-11-16 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The full proposal is attached below, and can be viewed here also: http://maven.apache.org/proposals/incubator/nmaven.html I'm posting this here for any feedback or objections from the inc