Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>> i like morgue also. and the suggested usage is distinct from the
>> archive.apache.org purpose. the latter is 'all things apache, for
>> all of time.' the morgue's purpose would be 'all things dead.'
>> there's a dif
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> i like morgue also. and the suggested usage is distinct from the
> archive.apache.org purpose. the latter is 'all things apache, for
> all of time.' the morgue's purpose would be 'all things dead.'
> there's a difference. you won't be able to
i like morgue also. and the suggested usage is distinct from the
archive.apache.org purpose. the latter is 'all things apache, for
all of time.' the morgue's purpose would be 'all things dead.'
there's a difference. you won't be able to tell, looking at the
archive, which packages are alive and
PROTECTED]>
08/15/2003 06:27 PM
Please respond to general
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: [PROPOSAL] Creating graveyard.apache.org
I don't know since I'm not the one who suggested it :-) "Ken Kr
I don't know since I'm not the one who suggested it :-) "Ken Kress" did.
However if I had to suggest what one would put in a morgue, I would suggest
dead people. They don't tend to fight too much and generally find the
accommodations acceptable.
-Andy
On 8/15/03 6:13 PM, "Paul Hammant" <[EMAIL
nt: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Creating graveyard.apache.org
>
> We have archive.apache.org, I don't see the need to create a new vhost.
>
> Brian
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > What about:
> >
>
Andy,
What are we planning to put in the morgue ?
- Paul
What about "morgue".
The things may be dead, but the living still want to poke them about a bit
before they are finally buried.. or perhaps brought back to life again in
the "return-of-the-living-dead.apache.org" project.
--
http
> What about "morgue".
The things may be dead, but the living still want to poke them about a bit
before they are finally buried.. or perhaps brought back to life again in
the "return-of-the-living-dead.apache.org" project.
;-)
d.
--
> > The infrastructure team is already preparing archive.apache.org for this
> > purpose.
> This is the technical part, and there is more to it, as policies wether
> a project is to be [archived], and how. There are also issues about
> what to gather [for archived] projects.
Those sound like goo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about "morgue".
:)
My 2c:
'orphan'
'dead'
Bill de hÓra
'Mostly dead is slightly alive' - Miracle Max
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
What about "morgue".
It fits in with the graveyard theme, but is also a newspaper
term for the old story archives. Look at one of the old
movies set in a newsroom and you will hear the term.
It's where they go to do research on old stories.
Just a suggestion.
Ken.
--
Ken Kress
IMO graveyard is the most descriptive term I have seen so far which
explains what the project is and does not sacrifice on style ;-)
--jason
On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 06:32 AM, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
What about a word everyone uses already (in incubator):
park.apache.org
Someone could start
What about a word everyone uses already (in incubator):
park.apache.org
Someone could start developing w/it again and ... unpark.
.V
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
On the Jakarta project we are removing a sub-project. Xml.Apache has
others in "hibernation" and others will surely follow.
Since the incu
Noel J. Bergman wrote, On 15/08/2003 0.04:
Nicola,
On the Jakarta project we are removing a sub-project. Xml.Apache has
others in "hibernation" and others will surely follow.
Just out of curiousity, why did you raise this on Incubator?
As it's the opposite of incubation.
The infrastructure team
We have archive.apache.org, I don't see the need to create a new vhost.
Brian
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> What about:
>
>graveyard.apache.org
>hibernation.apache.org
>byebye.apache.org
>devnull.apache.org
>frozen.apache.org
>...
>
> Where we c
Nicola,
> On the Jakarta project we are removing a sub-project. Xml.Apache has
> others in "hibernation" and others will surely follow.
Just out of curiousity, why did you raise this on Incubator?
The infrastructure team is already preparing archive.apache.org for this
purpose. As you know, all
-1 hibernation...to confusing with hibernate (the persistence tool).
Other than that it doesn't matter. My personal preference is
deadprojects.apache.org...but I have this weird love of descriptive/clear
names.
On 8/14/03 4:05 PM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the Jakar
On the Jakarta project we are removing a sub-project. Xml.Apache has
others in "hibernation" and others will surely follow.
Since the incubator accepts new projects, it seems obvious for me to
propose here the opposite. That means possibly taking the responsibility
of also moving the dead proje
18 matches
Mail list logo
