[RESULT][IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

clearance vote. Richard. -- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Downer Date: 29 February 2016 at 21:19 Subject: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI To: general@incubator.apache.org Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Thanks Craig. Richard, I would take Craig's answer as authorization to proceed. -Alex On 3/7/16, 9:43 AM, "Craig Russell" wrote: >A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor. > >If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, >no big deal IMHO.

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor. If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, no big deal IMHO. Clearly, bundled dependencies cannot be included in a grant since the grantor has no rights to them. The fact that they were included i

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer" wrote: >Alex, Justin, all, > >Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make >this statement for the record: > >Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link: >https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archi

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Alex, Justin, all, Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make this statement for the record: Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link: https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip SHA1: 5

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/1/16, 12:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these >> files in the zip referenced by the Grant. > >The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright >owner is IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think t

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Hi, > Sorry if I'm missing something, but it sounds like Justin found these > files in the zip referenced by the Grant. The files are clearly marked as BSD/MIT licensed and who the copyright owner is IMO (but I could be wrong) I don’t think the grant needs to be redone as it’s clear what would

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

On 3/1/16, 1:36 AM, "Richard Downer" wrote: >Justin, > >On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean >wrote: >>> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html >>> >> I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Hi, > MIT/BSD: yes this is intended Thanks all good. > It does appear that the LICENSE file is insufficient in this case so I > will push to get that fixed. Yes part of why I asked, but IMO that can be fixed up after the grant. > Crypto: the name of the folder is a red herring in this case N

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Justin, On 29 February 2016 at 22:36, Justin Mclean wrote: >> See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html >> > I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code. [1] Was > this intended? MIT/BSD:

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Hi, > Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool. > See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html > I notice the code contains MIT and BSD licensed code and crypto code. [1] Was this intended? Thanks, Just

[IP CLEARANCE] Apache Brooklyn - CLI

Apache Brooklyn is receiving a code for a new CLI tool. See http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html Please vote to approve this contribution. This is a lazy consensus majority vote, open for at least 72 hours. Thanks Richard --