The vote passes with a +1 from John D. Ament and a +0 from Justin
Mclean.
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r461725d0ff45a598308134e3e85d0ef70c0cfd884abbd46661897fc8%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
Thank you for the discussion and the votes,
Till
--
Hi,
Changing my vote to +0.
Thanks for your answers. I still have some concerns, and looking at the vote
thread / your mailing list, I cannot see any discussion about any potential IP
issues. It is not possible from the information provided to determine if the
PMC has taken the required steps
Hi John,
Thank you for your vote!
In executing and filing the SGA Couchbase asserts that it "owns or has
sufficient rights to contribute the software source code and other
related intellectual property". And I'm sure that Couchbase did not
execute the SGA without exercising due diligence befo
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:11 David Jencks wrote:
> I’m watching from the sidelines….
>
> IIUC you are saying that if AsterixDB started over with a history-free
> tarball for this donation this whole question of validating the source
> origin would not arise and we’d just trust the SGA?
No not
I’m watching from the sidelines….
IIUC you are saying that if AsterixDB started over with a history-free tarball
for this donation this whole question of validating the source origin would not
arise and we’d just trust the SGA?
While some history is nice to have, I’m not sure it’s worth this co
Hi Till
fwiw I think the donation is fine though the AsterixDB PMC will need to do
some due diligence in verifying ownership of code before forming a release.
This is likely what Justin is trying to refer to as well.
Some background on possible issues….
Before GitHub became the popular place to
Hi Justin,
On 3 Sep 2021, at 0:46, Justin Mclean wrote:
Please help me understand why
- the software grant from Couchbase and
- the acceptance from the AsterixDB project
are not sufficient to approve this donation.
Because IMO the information provided doesn’t give sufficient detail
to determ
Hi,
> Please help me understand why
> - the software grant from Couchbase and
> - the acceptance from the AsterixDB project
> are not sufficient to approve this donation.
Because IMO the information provided doesn’t give sufficient detail to
determine who has contributed to the codebase, the his
Hi Justin,
Please help me understand why
- the software grant from Couchbase and
- the acceptance from the AsterixDB project
are not sufficient to approve this donation.
Thank you for your help,
Till
On 2 Sep 2021, at 22:22, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
-1 on this until my previous questions on
Hi,
-1 on this until my previous questions on this donation are answered (included
again below):
Do we have a list of those developers and have they signed an ICLAs or do you
have a software grant from Couchbase for this code base?
Checking the IP of the donated code is difficult to do if all
Hi Incubator PMC,
The Apache AsterixDB project has voted [0] to accept the donation of the
AsterixDB JDBC Driver [1].
This code was originally developed by multiple developers at Couchbase
using the Apache License.
A SGA from Couchbase has been submitted to the ASF and the receipt of
the doc
Hi,
> This code was originally developed by multiple developers at Couchbase using
> the Apache License. No other license headers were removed.
Do a) we have a list of those developers and have they signed an ICLAs or do
you have a software grant from Couchbase for this code base?
> The reposi
Hi Justin,
This code was originally developed by multiple developers at Couchbase
using the Apache License. No other license headers were removed. The
repository with the Apache license headers was created with the purpose
of being donated to the ASF.
Till
On 22 Aug 2021, at 20:31, Justin M
Hi John,
No reason other than choosing the wrong list and sticking with it.
I'm canceling this VOTE and starting a new one.
Till
On 22 Aug 2021, at 19:19, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any reason that the vote occurred on your private list instead of the dev@
> list? Typically a change like th
Hi,
A few questions:
- Where was this code original developed and who worked on it? There is only a
couple of commits in that repro, so it doesn’t seem to have been developed
there.
- Why does the code have ASF headers on it before being donated? Were any 3rd
party headers removed?
- Have all c
Hi
Any reason that the vote occurred on your private list instead of the dev@
list? Typically a change like this would be voted on a public list. Note
that not all IPMC members would be able to see the vote thread in the
current state.
John
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 22:00 Till Westmann wrote:
>
Hi IPMC,
The Apache AsterixDB PMC has voted [0] to accept the donation of the
AsterixDB JDBC Driver [1].
Following the IP clearance process [2] this is a lazy consensus majority
vote, open for at least 72 hours.
Please VOTE to accept this contribution.
Thanks,
Till (on behalf of the Asteri
17 matches
Mail list logo
