Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator

On Oct 23, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: I took a peek at plexus and picocontainer mailing lists. One thing of note is that there seems to have been little discussion on the picocontainer lists about a move to Apache. Perhaps discussions were offline, but it's not clear to me how the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator

On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Compo

Re: Apache Composer Proposal

On Oct 8, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I am watching http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal with some interest. A couple of items: 1) JAMES uses Phoenix, which is the old name for Plexus yes, Loom was unsuccessful Phoenix fork. iirc, Plexus borrowed concepts from

Re: [VOTE] Retire AltRMI

On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: I myself am +0 as I don't follow the project but am in favor of fall/spring/periodic cleanups in general. However, I would not be at ease retiring a project without hearing from its mentor, who's yet to vote on this thread. AltRMI pre-dates mento

[VOTE] Retire AltRMI

The AltRMI podling, has become stagnant. Here is a vote to move it into retirement. [ ] -1 : It lives on, you someone missed my recent commits on it last week [ ] 0 : I don't do fall cleansing [ ] +1 : Move to retirement Here's my +1 -p

Re: [VOTE] [UPDATE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

On Jul 18, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Well, I just expressed my opinion as an ASF member, because this project and their mentors show no respect to the other members feelings about it. It is possible to respect other's feelings without agreeing with them. That's the case here. I

[HttpNIO] MINA and AsyncWeb

(resending since i think my first try didn't get noticed by the httpclient-dev moderators) howdy! I'm writing to see if there is interest in collaborating in a larger effort to develop HTTP code that utilizes NIO. MINA is a framework here a

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 17, 2006, at 5:31 AM, Dave Irving wrote: One thing I would like to discuss though is identity AsyncWeb currently has some form of identity in its own right as a project (and is already bundled as a standalone http transport in a couple of OSS projects). Is this likely to be affecte

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:05 AM, Dave Irving wrote: One thing which would be good to discuss still I think is location: E.g, are we proposing to bring AsyncWeb within Mina, or as a separate incubating project? My thought was to bring within MINA, let it flourish, and then have it leave MINA o

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 15, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Honestly, I'd recommend flipping it: get MINA to be TLP first and then move in AsyncWeb. There's no reason that AsyncWeb should land in the Directory TLP and then move again in short-order. Good point. If you submit the resolution ASAP, i

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: It almost sounds like this would be a good candidate for a software grant instead of meriting a full incubation. How large of a community is around AsyncWeb? From the proposal, it sounds just like one committer - so as long as the IP cleara

Re: [VOTE] CeltiXfire Project Proposal

On Jul 13, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: There has been plenty of discussion around the CeltiXfire proposal, we feel that all the issues forwarded have been addressed, and we would now like to officially propose CeltiXfire to the Incubator for consideration. The proposal can be foun

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Thomas Dudziak wrote: On 7/12/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some qui

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote: You might also want to CC Filip Hanik, [EMAIL PROTECTED], on this idea. Filip has been busily working on a NIO HTTP implementation for Tomcat, and has a working version. We've seen some quirky performance out of it. But that's besides the point

Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

On Jul 12, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Can you please ping the Jakarta HttpComponents folks? see what they think? done! (cc'd here as its a good place for common discussion) -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic sig

[HttpNIO] MINA and AsyncWeb

howdy! I'm writing to see if there is interest in collaborating in a larger effort to develop HTTP code that utilizes NIO. MINA is a framework here at the ASF for developing clients and servers based on NIO. There is also the AsyncWeb

[pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

I have been talking with Dave Irving who is the principal developer behind AsyncWeb, , an HTTP engine built upon MINA , on bringing the project to the ASF. I've started a proposal at

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, James Strachan wrote: On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Syn

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Trustin Lee wrote: Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will make this project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an incubation process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I will CC this message to

mentoring celtixfire

i'm volunteering to help mentor celtixfire, i've added myself to the list in the wiki. -pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 9, 2003, at 3:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: At the end a community vote decides the codebase to adopt or we can as well be left with just one proposal. This is what I had in mind from the beginning; what do you think? Repo != a codebase. Its just a spec. I don't think 'forced convergen

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 9, 2003, at 1:52 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: We need CPAN, or apt-get, or fink, or something slightly more dependency aware but not so much so that we sit on our thumbs waiting for it to happen. ... there are no methods of storing large objects more efficient than a modern filesystem. St

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 7, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The developers of Ruper in the meantime have become Apache committers (two for Gump and one is coming in with JUDDI). The issue here is that Maven already has some code for this, and http://greebo.sourceforge.net/ is partecipating too. If y

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Nov 7, 2003, at 4:15 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Proposal: This is a new kind of incubation that I'd like to try. It's not an established project that wants to come to Apache, rather an effort that wants to try and see if it can work, similar to Geronimo but coming mainly from Apache commit

Re: cvs commit: incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html

On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 10:19 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: can the docs be reproduced locally into the same usable format as they exist on the site, using a tool that anyone reading the docs would automatically have? yes. with that said, I like having javadocs on a website. For new p

Re: [altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:53 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Peter Royal wrote, On 15/03/2003 23.46: I found a bug in the AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer. Peter, we should move these development mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not your fault, the documentation is lacking. Didn&#

Re: [altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: Ooooh, been looking for something like that. Marathon ( http://marathonman.sourceforge.net/ ) is being bugged by an issue that sounds like it be caused by that. Lets go for START & STOP. The intermediate states were just just over-d

[altrmi] Bug in AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer

te is STARTING? -pete -- peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]