Hi all,
Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for
implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control
similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or something
like an ESP8266. These are devices that are much simpler (and ch
Totally agree.
Best regards,
David Bosschaert
On 21 November 2011 16:32, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> I still think that the release is a proper release - as Karl explained
> we could have done "better" source releases per module etc., but there
> is nothing fundamentally wrong.
> I don't think th
+1 (non-binding).
It would be great to see Ace as a top level project.
Best regards,
David Bosschaert
On 19 November 2011 01:33, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Friday, November 18, 2011, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> +1 binding
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:4
Being a fan and a regular contributor of Felix I still don't see why
Felix should have the monopoly on OSGi spec implementations.
If there is a group of people who would like to build a community
*specifically* around enterprise OSGi components, then why not let
them do that? If some of these thin
