that stage there are at
least 3 +1 votes and nothing left open for discussion.
+1 (mentor, binding)
Ate
Thanks,
Geertjan
on behalf of Apache NetBeans PPMC
1.
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/648834cdb10ce55aff2c6c8dd3c32454a74711c6289f385e456b74d8@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
2.
https
On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I
tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the
community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote:
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to
cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw
the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view,
it was time to g
ed to do a sequential vote later on in
case of huge or major changes, for example after a big code donation
being incorporated.
Ate
This is similar to having to report monthly for the first three
months, then quarterly.
-Bertrand
--
vote for this release candidate
and adjust the Maven groupId to org.apache.netbeans first.
Kind regards,
Ate
On 04/02/2019 14.57, Eric Barboni wrote:
Hi,
The NetBeans incubating community has approved the release of Apache
NetBeans parent pom. Vote thread is here [1] and the result is 5 +
Now provided sha256 checksum checked to be correct.
Hereby changing my vote back to +1 (binding)
Regards,
Ate
On 19/11/2018 15.40, Ate Douma wrote:
Sorry about overlooking this before, but as Henk P. Penning indicated
release artifacts now MUST be accompanied by a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512
Thanks, Laszlo.
sha256 checksum checked to be correct.
Hereby reconfirming my previous +1 (binding)
Regards,
Ate
On 20/11/2018 19.56, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from
this staging area, but wont move them over to the final re
-256 checksum file is
added.
(see also the vote thread for Netbeans 10.0 and Bertrand's likewise
comment and temporary change of vote).
Ate
On 18/11/2018 22.29, Ate Douma wrote:
+1 binding
- signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired)
- LICENSE and NOTICE files co
+1 binding
- signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired)
- LICENSE and NOTICE files correct
- source dist contents matches with contents of git release-1.6 tag
Regards,
Ate
On 18/11/2018 05.47, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Hi.
The NetBeans incubating community has just
something to look into.
Regards,
Ate
On 18/11/2018 16.33, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote:
Dear all,
The Apache NetBeans community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vc3].
We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
this incubator
On 18/11/2018 18.01, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I believe it is at least 5 days (or an X number, not sure what the X should
be officially) and with three +1 votes.
Release Votes SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours:
http://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval
There is
+1 binding
Regards,
Ate
On 2018-08-27 05:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into the
Apache Incubator.
The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text form as
well.
This vote will run at least 72 hours
On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote:
Ate, could we get a vote on this release?
Sure :-)
If you look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we
are already making progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported.
Yes, thanks for creating the
before the final 9.0 release.
Regards, Ate
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-305
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/540
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201801.mbox/%3cc4c5d5c4-ab44-4afe-ade2-9e91f593a...@classsoftware.com%3e
[3]
http
+1
Regards, Ate
On 2018-02-19 11:45, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi all,
The FreeMarker community has discussed [1] and voted [2] positively on
graduating to a top level project (TLP). The resolution for the graduation
has been proposed and discussed in this list [3].
Information about
The follow-up from Justin concerning possible restrictions on commercial
use with regards to http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=317 however got me
worried.
*That* would impact not just Netbeans but a whole range of other ASF
projects as well!
Ate
Gj
On Monday, January 22, 2018, Justin Mclean
w
+1, carrying over my mentor and binding vote from the netbeans dev list
vote thread
Ate
On 2017-11-21 14:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
The release hash is:
1189b293cecfd5236cf18df2c2bd0f6b414dab75
...
https://dist.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 2017-11-14 20:47, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1 (binding) over here as well again.
LieGrue,strub
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 10:47:50 GMT+1, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
...I'd
like to ask you to
+1 (binding)
One improvement to consider for the next release is appending the
license for Knockout (MIT) to the embedded LICENSE in the build ko4j
jar artifact, as is required for distributing this artifact.
And another is maybe generating a more explicit artifact name for ko4j.
Thanks,
Ate
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 2017-07-10 17:09, sblackmon wrote:
In concert with the discussion started last week [1], please vote on the draft resolution which establishes Apache Streams as a new top-level project at the Apache Software Foundation, as follows:
[ ] +1, Graduate Apache Streams from
Steve,
I have a few additional notes below.
As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings?
Sometimes your replies (like below) are not using any, which makes it very
difficult to distinguish your reply from the original message.
Thanks, Ate
On 2016-11-10 21:27
Thanks for catching this Justin!
I just checked and this same issue was also present in the Streams
0.3-incubating release, so we overlooked it the previous time as well.
We'll fix these and then come back with a new release candidate.
Ate
On 2016-11-02 04:21, jus...@classsoftware.com
h.
Do I need to execute that locally and then commit the generated changes?
I couldn't find specific documentation instructions other than just updating
the podlings.xml file.
Note: I have the same question for the Netbeans podling which also isn't
showing up in the clutch report page
until tomorrow. Then I can try to help with setting
up the podling.
@Niclas: thanks for the link to ZEST-1, great reference point!
Ate
Regards Raphael
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Michael Müller
wrote:
I've sent it. ;-)
--
Herzliche Grüße, Best regards
Michael Müller
Twitter: @muellerm
On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Sorry, Bertrand, not Ate, though I feel they're in sync.
In this case, you felt right :-)
Syncing with the mentors would have been appreciated, but I also
see no harm done in Roman's trying to help out.
Thanks Roman!
Ate
Gj
On
p, we need to all be comfortable with cutting bait on it.
I agree, and I think it is a good suggestion to switch back to a 3 monthly
reporting schedule to keep the IPMC in the loop on progress (or lack thereof).
Ate
John
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 12:25
On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed
before I make this so?
Without further feedback I'm going to assume lazy consensus and wil
This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
[] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ...
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To
. Please VOTE as follows
[] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
[] +0 Abstain.
[] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ...
The proposal is listed below, but you can also access it on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
Thanks,
Ate
Hi Mark,
On 2016-09-27 09:44, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Ate!
It's quite natural that many other projects just point to DeltaSpike.
DS was in 2011 amongst the very first projects using GIT at the ASF.
One of the results of this effort (together with the CouchDB community) was
following doc
include the text
of https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal
If can send out the vote mail in about an hour or so if everyone is OK.
Ate
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
+1
Ate
On 2016-09-27 14:23, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 14:11, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament
wrote:
Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to wait longer before starting a
vote?..
I'
incubator guide.
So where is or was this discussed, do you have some pointers?
Thanks, Ate
The nice thing about GIT is that it absolutely doesn't matter where I push the
commit to as long as the sha1 of the commit later pushed to the ASF repo is the
same.
Regarding 'pushing s
erning the process for assigning Suneel as mentor, can we assume lazy
consensus and just 'make it so' in a few days, if nobody objects?
Thanks, Ate
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can&#
e ASF will
benefit the project as well as the community.
Nor have I have seen one single argument to the contrary.
Regards, Ate
The costings here are more
than we usually get when a new podling is considered. This is a very good
start.
The data I refer to is only one data point. If you have
On 2016-09-25 17:20, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
and not all committers are required to commit :-)
That is interesting. Can you explain more about that?
What I meant to say is that at the ASF we also value and honour merit based on
things
On 2016-09-25 12:15, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases
contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list.
Hi GeertJan,
I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO
I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams.
I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed
before I make this so?
Ate
On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Ma
#x27;
for this purpose. And AFAICT nobody questioned the list to be unfair or not
'good enough'. Of course adding one or two extra who were overlooked and are
expected to help make a difference and speed up the process still is fine.
So my strong advise is to stick to the original list.
And
In light of the positive feedback and input from Benjamin Young from W3C and
Suneel Marthi which hopefully will lead to a renewal of activity and a move
forwards for Apache Streams, I'm hereby cancelling this vote for retirement.
I'm looking forward to the next steps!
Kind regards
W3C arrows this direction" already is a great way to start :-)
Kind regards, Ate
On 2016-09-23 17:45, Benjamin Young wrote:
I am currently sitting in the W3C’s Social Web Working Group’s face-to-face
meeting and have just finished discussing features of ActivityStreams 2.0:
https://www.w3.org/TR/
On 2016-09-21 18:28, apache wrote:
I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social web
data interoperability. Participating in the incubator process has taught me a
lot, and I would like the keep the project operating at Apache, but as Ate
points out the community
7;d be happy to postpone/cancel
the retirement VOTE for now.
I suggest to head over to d...@streams.incubator.apache.org, let us know
what you can and will do for the project, and see how that works out.
Regards, Ate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Do
On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote:
Ate,
Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Right.
Thanks for pointing this out John.
I've never before had t
On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote:
Ate,
Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Right.
Thanks for pointing this out John.
I've never before had to handle a podling retirement and overl
FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first initiated a
[discuss] thread more than a week ago, which resulted in zero feedback.
Ate
(Streams mentor)
Forwarded Message
Subject: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 23:
On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ...
At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't
been addressed so far and would prevent us
re this is not clear or can be clearer, tell me and we will
change/add/whatever. FYI -- no one creating independent products based on
Apache NetBeans cares what its name is.
Only two things are in discussion right now: (1) licensing [which has been
discussed quite a bit with Apache folks like Bertr
On 2016-09-14 21:43, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate
any code from
David explained below.
Of course, externally hosted plugin binaries still remain external.
But verified Apache compliant plugins could be hosted at Apache itself.
As well as clearly marked in the plugin portal as such, further strengthening
the project and community binding at Apache.
Ate
[1] htt
Just for the record I'd like to add my binding +1 as well
Regards, Ate (AsterixDB mentor)
On 2016-04-11 06:10, Till Westmann wrote:
Hi,
the vote is now closed. The vote passes with the following votes:
+1 : 5 (all binding)
Chris Mattmann
Henry Saputra
Till Wes
ver Justin (see below) seems to indicate that even this is not needed?
The reference to [2] as clarification however doesn't seems to be sufficient.
I'd like to know if there is more / clearer clarification available on this.
Or if there is not then this should be made explicit, required
On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation
On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Incubator PMC report for November 2015
* Ready to graduate
- AsterixDB
While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I
think it shouldn't be listed as such.
Ate (AsterixDB m
voting round also account/tally for the second
IMPC voting round on general@.
So in this case (taking into account that Till voted +1 twice, which technically
wasn't necessary) the finally tally of binding +1 votes actually was +5.
Ate
-Ian
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Mike Carey
72 hours:
[ ] +1 accept Freemarker into the Apache Incubator
[ ] ±0 Abstain
[ ] -1 because...
+1 (binding)
Ate
Thank you,
Jacopo Cappellato
1.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201505.mbox/%3cccefe3ed-66c4-4766-a3d2-6d8bda855...@gmail.com%3e
2.
https
included at the bottom of this email.
Vote is open until at least Saturday, 21st March 2015, 23:59:00 PST
[ ] +1 accept Groovy in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because...
Thanks,
Roman.
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe
+1 (binding)
Very interesting.
And if you still like or need another mentor, I'd be willing to help out.
Ate
On 2015-02-20 06:38, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote:
Hi Everyone,
OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally
suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for
release candidate I strongly suggest to provide at least a basic
"getting started" either online or with the source because for outsiders it is
totally unclear how to use Streams or even what it does ...
Regards, Ate
For the IPMC: I'm a mentor on Streams but was on holiday when t
+1 (binding)
On 2014-12-19 06:29, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
and is a
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 2014-12-09 12:49, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Flink community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed with
27 +1s (including 12 +1s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s.
Here is the vote thread in the Dev list:
http://apache-flink-incubator-mailing-list-archive
On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
it looks like September report is almost done,
except the following podlings:
* Streams
[ ](streams) Matt Franklin
[ ](streams) Ate Douma
[ ](streams) Craig McClanahan
If there's any chance the above mentor
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnso
t the Stratos project as an incubating project
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept the Stratos project as an incubating project
> because... (provide reason)
>
+1 (binding)
Ate
> It's late on Friday evening here in the UK. I'll let this vote run
> well int
On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
+1 @Marcel
Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or
not ?
He is asking for help (Champion) to create such a draft :)
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards, Ate
On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Dear ASF members,
We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal,
follows below the proposal
Open is open for at least 72h
On 03/05/2013 01:47 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
After making source changes, then i just go to
https://cms.
I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too.
Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to
trigger that, if even needed?
Thanks, Ate
On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ...
Those proj
o the affiliation section of the proposal as well.
Kind regards,
Ate
On 11/14/2012 01:41 PM, Davide Palmisano wrote:
Thanks Matthew,
but the page is an immutable one.
how can I do?
cheers,
Davide
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: D
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also
+1
Ate
On 10/24/2012 08:32 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate the Wookie podling from Apache Incubator.
Wookie entered the Incubator in July of 2009. During incubation, Wookie has:
* Produced 5 releases
* Added 3 new Committer/PPMC members
* Cleared IP on all
+1 (Airavata Mentor)
Ate
On 09/08/2012 03:23 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:11 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
wrote:
+1 from me! (binding)
Great work guys! During the discussion I requested to be included on the PMC
and there was also talk of Ross being th
Hi Suresh,
I looked at the two issues raised and IMO these do not pose as blockers for this
release, so +1 from me on this release candidate (binding and Mentor)
More feedback below.
Regards, Ate
On 08/01/2012 03:46 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Hi All,
The VOTE is called for a lazy consensus
+1 (binding, as well as a late Airavata PPMC Mentor vote)
Ate
On 06/18/2012 12:27 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the following
Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts.
We are requesting at least one additional IPMC
Dave should mail his incubator wiki id here and request being added to the wiki
ContributersGroup [1].
Once added to this page (by an incubator wiki admin) Dave can add/edit wiki
pages himself.
Ate
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup
On 06/19/2012 11:28 AM, Ross Gardler
leaning this up a bit further.
In addition, those samples modules also have additional NOTICE and LICENSE files
in their src/main/resources folders, but AFAIK these are not or no longer
used/bundled in the build artifact. Possibly outdated/leftover?
IMO none of the above really are release blocke
I haven't seen anyone respond to this yet and I'm in a tight spot myself to make
time for it.
I'll try to free up some by tomorrow though, please accept my apologies for the
delay.
Ate
On 04/22/2012 06:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Sorry to cross post here, but I t
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 04/10/2012 03:32 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
ing
--
+1 (binding)
Ate
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
After 72+ hours this vote has passed with the following tally of 13 votes in
total, including +11 binding IPMC member votes:
+1:
Ross Gardler*
Chris Mattmann*
Arje Cahn
Hadrian Zbarcea*
Ate Douma*
Alex Karasulu*
Jukka Zitting*
Alan D. Cabrera*
Jean-Baptiste Onofré*
Niall Pemberton*
Henry
On 02/29/2012 03:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
det
On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
...
They remain.
Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is
our
determination, and is our Right.
Sorry but I don't th
affiliation with the ASF and probably
should value project independence high as well.
If this really only concerns a thin layer to provide compatibility only for
Cloudera's API, hosting and maintenance of this should be the responsibility of
Cloudera itself.
Ate
Now the questio
+1 (binding)
On 02/27/2012 01:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
members, and shows a steady growth of community and
vote on recommending the graduation of Rave
with the below resolution [2] to the ASF Board.
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 to recommend graduation of Apache Rave as TLP
[ ] +0 don't care.
[ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, because ...
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
Regards, Ate
eived 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev -
VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G
RESULT: http://s.apache.org/Fcv
IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list:
Ate Douma: +1
Ross Gardler: +1
Release notes:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.8-incubating/CHANGEL
Thanks many times Noel!
This also makes (for me) voting for Jukka again a proper process.
I'm therefore reconfirming my earlier retracted vote for Jukka, +1
Ate
On 02/10/2012 03:31 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
I'm ready to vote, but Chris said "it looks lik
a majority from only those
who voted, etc.
With Noel not being voted on *at the same time*, there is no proper comparison
possible on the result (votes for Jukka) and 'undetermined result (support for
Noel).
Ate
Cheers,
Chris
ption AFAICS.
I agree.
I already voted for Jukka, under the impression only he now remained candidate.
Seeing that not being the case (or properly checked), I'm retracting my
preliminary vote for Jukka (for now).
Ate
-Bertrand
--
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the
running
have aligned beyond the following nominee:
+1, good luck!
Ate
On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE
On 02/06/2012 07:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, "Greg Stein" wrote:
On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, "sebb" wrote:
...
Perhaps the answer to "Why is a licensing header necessary?"
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-heade
On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[legal-discuss@?]
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them?
Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream
users have the right to di
On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote:
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
wrote:
I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this
page), but the release
some 'bug' IMO.
I can't recall have heard it said like this before, instead confirmation of the
above rule quite often. Exceptions (no headers) only being allowed for sources
without real IP value.
Ate
IMHO if the headers are problematic for Wookie in
those files then it would
sues, but radically killing it off
IMO will also kill off more than just those issues: it will also kill the
Incubator community itself. Maybe ComDev can or actually then will have to take
over, but we should be really careful before breaking something down without
having a replacement 'sa
den?
There surely is a lot to improve, but rushing into half-backed and not properly
thought through radical changes doesn't make sense to me.
So, taking a step back, and have the proposers draft up a comprehensible story
first, and *please* not on this list but on the wiki, really
On 02/03/2012 06:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
+1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions.
+1 on that
Ate
Karl
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.]
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mattmann
realize something not clear from this proposal: are we *only* talking
about the Incubator PMC Chair here, or is this a proposal for every PMC Chair?
I presumed (and propose) the latter, but maybe that wasn't the intend (yet).
Ate
Ross
-Ber
On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree with the topic of
this
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
