Vic Cekvenich wrote:
Also... it may take a lot of limited resources to resolve.
Consider just giving it back to IBM for now, utill it's solved, so the
rest of ASF projects are not afected. Maybe it does not not need to
get resolved, no gun at ASF head, why risk one later on a similar case
Jim Barnett wrote:
Also, having owners assign copyrights to ASF would probably be a
mistake. First, ASF really doesn't have the resources or (I would
guess) the interest in enforcing copyrights assigned to it when a
third party uses the contributed work outside the scope of the Apache
licens
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
Jim Barnett wrote:
Also, having owners assign copyrights to ASF would probably be a
mistake. First, ASF really doesn't have the resources or (I would
guess) the interest in enforcing copyrights assigned to it when a
third party uses the contributed work outside the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
... I have no idea what
"one long e-mail" you mean, or what "main issue" you think you have raised.
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=2592
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
I think you guys are talking around the "main issue" here, the one long
e-mail I sent.
Just address the "main issue" direct and once; make it public and the
rest is easy.
.V
ps: I think that the legal entity accountable for incubator.apache.org,
as per DNS registar is ASF. It may not be a rele
Sam Ruby wrote:
Put in tangible terms, I would much prefer to see a incubator puruse a
vote of [no] confidence in the Geronimo PPC than to have the incubator
continue to debate the name of the project.
That would clear up a lot.
+1 from a non-voter.
.V
-
This is being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and cc-ed most ( I had to manually
search for e-mails of each, so I gave up after a while) of the officers-
because it discusses policy, and cc-ed the incubator list so there is a
record of it. Before this, I posted a few messages on Jakarta-General,
sam
This is being sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and cc-ed most ( I had to manually
search for e-mails of each, so I gave up after a while) of the officers-
because it discusses policy, and cc-ed the incubator list so there is a
record of it. Before this, I posted a few messages on Jakarta-General,
sam
http://wiki.codehaus.org/geronimo/WishList#preview
I wonder if Geronio will have these:
15. JSF
Open Source Implementation of Java Server Faces
16. IoC Container
A light implementation of IoC container, similar to PicoContainer and
HiveMind.
.V
Siva wrote:
You should try to subscribe to the
(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
-1
Here is why:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
And I am with JBoss on this, you can't just fork the code.
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba )
No need for complexia
What about a word everyone uses already (in incubator):
park.apache.org
Someone could start developing w/it again and ... unpark.
.V
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
On the Jakarta project we are removing a sub-project. Xml.Apache has
others in "hibernation" and others will surely follow.
Since the incu
(Note: I am not a comitter, but a user)
-1
Here is why:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03376.html
And I am with JBoss on this, you can't just fork the code.
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba )
No need for complexia
Henri Yandell wrote:
Geronimo had nothing to do with elba.
Also, nothing wrong with elba forking the code. That's open source at
work. What would be wrong would be Geronimo using elba, as elba must be
GPL'd.
Geronimo is a different product to JBoss. JBoss is 'free-software' with
all the viral/GNU
Keep your FUD to yourself -- it is not welcome here. Especially when you
have no facts.
-g
I think this is beeing rushed, and the process looks diferent then the
process for Tapestry into incubator for example, where there was a
public vote; and I think Incubator had a process documemented some
I love the idea of having an EJB server be part of Apache, and want to
see it happen.
.. and that I think is worst part of J2EE, that ASF should avoid.
.V
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
Hey, these guys have open source too:
http://jcorporate.com/html/products/productsfm.html
Lets raid them next, fork the code and put in ASF!?
Any other projects?
Sad.
.V
"James Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Its natural. He sees the future of JBoss, and i
.
(Me telling you this is just to be nice, so you don't wonder why you're
being ignored, its not a indication of interest or bandwidth)
-Andy
On 5/27/03 8:46 PM, "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been trying to get basicPortal.sf.net into incubato
I have been trying to get basicPortal.sf.net into incubator.
It can even qualify for Jakarta.
What is the status/process?
.V
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
+1: Jim Jagielski, B.W. Fitzpatrick, Sander Striker, Nicola Ken Barozzi,
Ken Coar, Paul Hammant
No negative votes.
Tapestry exit Incubator...
How do I nudge basicPortal along?
.V
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/27 15:23:52 $]
Background:
o See the bottom of this file for the official resolution/
charter-as-it-stands
to re-package the screens/src and place on Jakarta, if you
like the idea.
more info at basicPortal.sf.net
Vic Cekvenich
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and just do the missing parts.
It is always in the top 10% of sf.net and has about 1,600 downloads per
month.
I would like to re-package the screens/src and place on Jakarta, if you
like the idea.
more info at basicPortal.sf.net
Vic Cekvenich
21 matches
Mail list logo
