+1
Tom
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Jim Apple wrote:
> The graduation of Impala to a TLP has been discussed[0] on dev@impala,
> voted on[1] on dev@impala, and discussed[2] on general@incubator. All
> threads were open 72 hours or more, and all seem to have quiesced.
>
> This is a call for a V
+1
Tom
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please vote on the draft resolution proposed by the Apache Beam PPMC below,
> which establishes Apache Beam as a new top-level project at the Apache
> Software Foundation, as follows:
>
> [ ] +1, Graduate Apache Beam fr
+1
Tom
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept Spot into the Apache Incubator because
+1 (binding)
Tom
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the positive discussion[1] and vote[2] in the Sentry
> community and a discussion[3] on the incubator list to graduate
> Sentry, I am calling a VOTE to graduate the project from the Incubator
> t
Dataflow is actively used by a number of organizations and
> institutions for batch and stream processing of data. We believe acceptance
> will allow us to consolidate existing Dataflow-related work, grow the
> Dataflow community, and deepen connections between Dataflow and other open
> so
The vote to accept Impala into the incubator has passed
(http://s.apache.org/u6r), however there are still some concerns about
CTR/RTC. My main takeaways from the CTR/RTC thread are that it's not a
binary choice, and that it's entirely reasonable that different
communities have different commit pol
+1 (binding)
Tom
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to
> call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is
> pasted below and also available on the wiki at:
> https://w
w.
> We are involved with discussions that the Kudu team at Cloudera have been
> having with Jake Farrell to start discussions on how Gerrit can fit into
> the ASF. We know that several other ASF projects or podlings are also
> interested in Gerrit.
>
> If the Infrastructure team do
* Jonathan Coveney
>* Tianshuo Deng
>* Jake Farrell
>* Marcel Kornacker
>* Mickael Lacour
>* Julien Le Dem
>* Alex Levenson
> * Nong Li
>* Todd Lipcon
>* Chris Mattmann
>* Aniket Mokashi
>* Lukas Nalezenec
>
urce community successfully, attracting
> over 40 contributors (see
> https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/graphs/contributors) from a diverse
> group of companies.
> Several of the core contributors to the project are deeply familiar with
> OSS and Apache specifically: Julien Le De
+1
I noticed a couple of things to fix for the next release (not blockers):
* Missing license header in twill-0.1.0-incubating/checkstyle.xml
* There's a file called DEPENDENCIES which looks like it is
auto-generated, and is not in the tagged source, but is in the source
archive.
Cheers,
Tom
On
bversion Directory ==
>
> Git is the preferred source control system: git://git.apache.org/twill
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Twill (TWILL)
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The existing code already has unit tests, so we would
+1
Tom
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
> seemingly resolved.
>
> I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
>
> The proposal is included below and is also at:
>
> https://wiki.ap
om)
> * David Nalley (ke4qqq at apache.org)
> * Erick Tryzelaar(etryzelaar at iqt.org)
> * Greg Chanan (gchanan at apache.org)
> * Hadi Nahari (hnahari at nvidia.com)
> * Jarek Jarcec Cecho (jarcec at apache.org)
> * Johnny Zhang (xiaoyuz at cloudera.com)
> * Karthik
+1 verified signature and checksum, ran RAT, checked LICENSE, NOTICE
and DISCLAIMER, built from source.
Tom
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first release candidate for Apache Provisionr, version
> 0.4.0-incubating.
>
> The PPMC vote thread:
>
> http://mail-archi
+1 (verified checksum and signature, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER).
Tom
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Benjamin Mahler
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> (incubating) version 0.12.0. This will be the fourth incubator release for
> Mesos in Apache
gt; of the Apache Mesos Project; and be it further
> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Mesos Project:
>
> * Ali Ghodsi
> * Andy Konwinski
> * Benjamin Hindhman
> * Benj
ests the following
> allocation on the Apache git server:
>
> git://git.apache.org/incubator-jclouds.git
>
> === Issue Tracking ===
>
> jclouds currently uses GitHub for issue tracking. The intent is to request
> an allocation for Jira upon acceptance into the Incubator
sionr (PROVISIONR)
>
> === Other Resources ===
>
> The existing code already has unit and integration tests so we would like a
> Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be
> added after project creation.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Tom do you want to be a champion for this proposal?
Yes, I'd be happy to.
One thing I think is worth discussing more here is whether Provisionr
should be a TLP on graduation, or whether it should be a module in
Whirr. Provisionr shares no co
+1 checked signatures and checksums, RAT report is clean, license and
notice look good, builds from source.
Tom
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Josh Wills wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Crunch 0.5.0 (incubating). This is our third
DOT org knox-commits AT incubator DOT
> apache DOT org knox-user AT hms incubator apache DOT org knox-private
> AT incubator DOT apache DOT org
>
> Subversion Directory
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/knox
>
> Issue Tracking
>
> JIRA Knox (KNOX)
>
> In
This looks like an interesting and useful project. I'd like to volunteer as
a mentor on it.
Thanks,
Tom
On 11 Feb 2013 14:56, "Kevin Minder" wrote:
> Knox Gateway Proposal
>
> == Abstract ==
>
> Knox Gateway is a system that provides a single point of secure access for
> Apache Hadoop clusters.
+1
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Adam Berry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
> submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
>
> Cheers,
> Adam Berry
>
> = HDT (Hadoop Development Tools) =
>
> == A
nd
>hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> Apache Bigtop Project:
>
> * Alan Gatesga...@apache.org
> * Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org
> * Steve Loughranste...@apache.org
> *
+1
Verified signature and checksums. Ran a RAT report. Checked for binary
and SCM files. Read LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER files - all look
correct. Built from source successfully.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote on r
+1
Tom
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below.
>
> Please cast your vote:
>
> [ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ]
+1 I checked the signature and checksums, inspected the source tag,
ran a RAT report, checked the disclaimer, notice and license files.
Tom
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMCs,
>
> Oozie Incubator community has voted on the Oozie 3.2.0-incubating relea
formance, usability, and robustness improvements.
> * Improving diagnostic reporting and debugging for individual !MapReduce
> jobs.
> * Providing a centralized place for contributed extensions and
> domain-specific applications.
>
> = Current Status =
>
> == Meritocracy ==
&
According to Clutch [1] the project has added 8 committers since it
entered incubation. Regarding diversity, committers from over four
organizations are actively involved in Flume development, which is
pretty healthy. There does seem to be a need to have more diversity at
the PPMC level, however, s
+1 to graduate MRUnit.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Jim Donofrio wrote:
> We havent heard anything +1 or -1 from any IPMC members besides our mentors.
> Any thoughts on this vote?
>
> We released 0.9.0-incubating on Tuesday so we have completed 4 releases and
> added 4 new commite
+1 checked checksums, signatures, license/notice/disclaimer, svn tag.
Tom
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.9.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?p
+1 checked checksums and signatures; license, notice, disclaimer and
svn tag all look correct.
Tom
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos
> (incubating) version 0.9.0. This will be the first incubator release f
+1 (binding)
Tom
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
> The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
> vote with:
> +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
> +0: don't care
+1
Verified checksums and signature, ran unit tests, checked license and
notice. I also successfully ran MRUnit tests against Hadoop 1.0 and
0.23 code.
Tom
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.1-incubating.
>
> It fi
+1 Unpacked and ran the unit tests successfully. Checksums and
signature are good. RAT passes. LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER look
ok.
Tom
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> 1.4.1-incubating.
>
> We alre
+1
Checked signatures/md5, ran RAT, tag looks good.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Bilung Lee wrote:
> This will be the first incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version
> 1.4.0-incubating.
>
> We got two IPMC votes from our dev list and are looking for a third.
> Thanks!
>
> **
+1
Signatures and checksums look good. I could successfully build from
source. RAT ran cleanly.
Cheers,
Tom
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
> 0.5.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issue
+1
I verified checksums and signature. NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER
files look good. I ran RAT and the files without licenses seem to be
test data.
Tom
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
> $ mv
+1
I checked signatures and checksums, ran RAT, and started a cluster.
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version 0.6.0-incubating
> and the last release as an incubator project.
>
> It fixes the following iss
+1
I verified signatures and checksums, and ran RAT.
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White wrote:
>> The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
>> votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
>> votes, and n
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
votes, and no -1 votes.
The binding +1 votes:
Chris A. Mattmann
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Doug Cutting
Stefan Seelmann
Non-binding +1 votes:
Hyunsik Choi
Thanks eve
* Tibor Kiss
* Johan Oskarsson
* Andrew Purtell
* Andrei Savu
* Tom White
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Tom White
be appointed to the office
+1
Tom
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be found in t
The 72 hour voting period has elapsed, and the vote has passed, with
19 +1 votes (12 binding), no -1 votes, and no 0 votes.
Binding votes (IPMC members):
Chris A. Mattmann
Leif Hedstrom
Patrick Hunt
Ralph Goers
Michael McCandless
Robert Burrell Donkin
Nigel Daley
Tom White
Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1
Tom
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom White wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the proposal thread, I would
> like to initiate a vote to accept Bigtop as an Apache Incubator
> project.
>
> The proposal is available at
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
project have contributed towards
Hadoop or related Apache projects (Alejandro Abdelnur, Konstantin
Boudnik, Eli Collins, Alan Gates, Patrick Hunt, Steve Loughran, Owen
O'Malley, John Sichi, Michael Stack, Tom White) and are familiar with
Apache principals and philosophy for community driven sof
Alan Gates has volunteered to be a committer and mentor, so I added
him to the proposal. (For some reason his email to this list didn't
come through.)
Thanks Alan!
Tom
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Inc
Owen,
Thanks for offering to help out.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Tom White wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project.
>> Bigtop is a proje
gt;
> PS: having ready to use .rpm and .deb packages sounds really great!
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Tom White wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
Steve,
Thanks for signing up.
Bigtop should not maintain branches or patchsets on top of upstream
projects. Any bugs or compatibility problems that are found will need
to be resolved in the upstream projects and then released in those
projects. This makes things harder for Bigtop, but, like you,
.
* Roman Shaposhnik designed and implemented the system testing framework.
Many of the committers to the Bigtop project have contributed towards
Hadoop or related Apache projects (Alejandro Abdelnur, Eli Collins,
Patrick Hunt, John Sichi, Michael Stack, Tom White) and are familiar
with Apache prin
;
> Binding votes
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Ralph Goers
> Julien Vermillard
> Mark Struberg
> Tommaso Teofili
> Leo Simons
> Christian Grobmeier
> Niall Pemberton
> Patrick Hunt
> Tom White
>
> Non-binding votes
>
> Ioa
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Flume (FLUME)
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The existing code already has unit and integration tests so we would like a
> Jenkins instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be
> added after project creation.
>
&
+1
Tom
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
> As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
> days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
> Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
> of the proposal
This vote has now passed with 3 binding +1s (2 from the dev list
vote), no +0's, and no -1's.
The binding votes were:
Stefan Seelmann, +1
Doug Cutting, +1 (on dev vote thread)
Tom White, +1 (on dev vote thread)
The non-binding votes (including those from the dev list vote) were
Both, source and binary tarballs contain two log files in the cli folder.
This has already been fixed in trunk so it doesn't happen for the next release.
Cheers,
Tom
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Tom White wrote:
>> Please vote
Please vote on the following release candidate for Apache Whirr,
version 0.5.0-incubating. We already received two binding IPMC +1
votes for the PPMC release vote on whirr-dev.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-whirr-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktimd_d7ar611s4
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 22:02, Tom White wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>>> On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of
>>> 3rd party products which are not mentioned in either the NOTICE file
>>> or the LICENSE file.
With 3 +1's (binding votes from Doug Cutting and Tom White were made
on the whirr-dev vote thread) and no -1's the vote passes. I'll roll
out the release.
Thanks,
Tom
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 26/01/2011 05:30, Tom White wrote:
>>
>&g
This is the third incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.3.0-incubating. We already received one binding IPMC +1 vote for the
PPMC release vote on whirr-dev, so are looking for two more.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-whirr-dev/201101.mbox/%3caa
* mesos-user
>
>
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos
>
>
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Mesos (MESOS)
>
>
>
> == Other Resources ==
>
> The
Thanks David. I think we can run a separate vote thread once this
proposal thread has run its course. Other recent proposal threads seem
to have general votes of support on them. As you say, this phase is a
time to respond to any questions that are raised, attract more
mentors, and so on.
Cheers,
esos-private for private PMC discussions (with moderated subscriptions)
> * mesos-dev
> * mesos-commits
> * mesos-user
>
>
>
> == Subversion Directory ==
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mesos
>
>
>
> == Issue Tracking ==
>
> JIRA Me
+3
> * Sertan Alkan sertanalkan [at] gmail.com Konneka +3
> * Julien Nioche jnioche [at] apache.org DigitalPebble
> <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DigitalPebble> +1
> * Andrzej Bialecki ab [at] apache.org Sigram
>
With 3 binding +1 IPMC votes (Ant Elder, Doug Cutting, and Tom White)
and no 0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. I'll proceed with the final
steps of the release.
Thanks to everyone who helped with the release!
Tom
BTW I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-91 to
a
+1 Sounds very interesting. I'd be happy to help out as a mentor.
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Enis Soztutar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We would like to announce the Proposal for Gora, an ORM for Colum Stores,
> for the Apache Incubation. We believe that Gora can find a nice home at
>
I posted a little earlier volunteering to be a mentor, but it looks
like it may be in the moderation queue. Anyway, +1 to the proposal,
and happy to help out if you still need a mentor.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> FYI, if any mento
This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.1.0-incubating. We already received one binding IPMC +1 vote for the
PPMC release vote on whirr-dev, so are looking for two more.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-whirr-dev/201009.mbox/%3caa
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> FYI I just fixed the report (although it said "closed") at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/May2010 - the beginning of Clerezza
> report had been mistakenly deleted in revision 19.
>
> Looks like there are other inconsist
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, T
The vote passes with 11 +1s (6 binding), zero 0s and zero -1s.
The next step is to create the podling and infrastructure.
Thanks,
Tom
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> [X] +1 Accept Whirr for incubation
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 5/5/10 2:06 PM, T
ere originally created by Tom White, and have had
a substantial number of contributions from members of the Hadoop
community. By becoming its own project, significant contributors to
Whirr would become committers, and allow the project to grow.
=== Community ===
The community interested in cloud
Patrick,
That sounds great - thanks for volunteering. I've added you to the
initial committer list on the proposal page at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrProposal.
Steve Loughran has volunteered to be a mentor; I've added his name too.
I would like to send a vote on this proposal to the I
Thanks for the advice, Niclas. I've sent a mail to the PMC private list.
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Tom White wrote:
>>> You do know any ASF member can sign up to be an incubator mentor, right? If
>
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
> ...and pasted inline below (as is customary). The proposal looks fine to me.
> Like you mention your initial group of committers is a bit small which is a
> risk but hey, cloud is hot, go build community :)
That's the plan.
> You do know any
e point, I'll bug you on list ^_^
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/oodt.html
>
>
> On 4/15/10 2:42 PM, "Tom White" wrote:
>
> I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal.
>
> Whirr will be a set of libraries
I would like to propose Whirr as an incubator proposal.
Whirr will be a set of libraries for running cloud services, such as
Hadoop or Cassandra. The initial code (for Hadoop) is hosted as a
Hadoop contrib module, but I believe it would flourish as its own
project with its own community.
The prop
80 matches
Mail list logo
