RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 4)

Congratulations and Nice work everybody. Regards, Adi Sakala > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:39 AM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Incubating Release

> Has CXF passed the TCK for JSR-181 (JAX-WS)? CXF project don't have access to TCK to measure this. I have sent couple of emails to jcp-open mailing list requesting to acquire this TCK. Looks like Geir has JSR-914 (JMS) in queue before JAX-WS. Hope we can get on this TCK soon :) Thanks, Adi Saka

RE: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3)

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 3:52 PM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Incubator CXF 2.0-M1 Release (RC 3) > > The Apache CXF team has cut another candidate

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:12 PM > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.0-M1 Release > > The Apache CXF team has cut a candidate release and publishe

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

Go Qpid Go... Obviously +1 Did anybody do any trademark investigation? I didnt find anything problematic in my simple search ;) http://firstgovsearch.gov/search?affiliate=uspto.gov&v%3Aproject=firstgov&query=qpid thanks, Adi > -Original Message- > From: Bryan Che [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

rg > Subject: Re: Glasgow - new name proposal > > > It'll be pretty hard to get a good search engine ranking for > that though. > > Eelco > > > On 8/8/06, Sakala, Adinarayana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like Cricket. > > "Apac

RE: Glasgow - new name proposal

I like Cricket. "Apache Cricket", I already started to think of some cool logos for this ;) - Adi > -Original Message- > From: Joyce, Sean (Sam) > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 4:06 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Glasgow - new name proposal > > > Hmm, this pickin

RE: mentoring celtixfire

Great, Welcome Aboard! Thanks for volunteering to help us out. Regards, Adi Sakala -Original Message- From: peter royal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:44 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: mentoring celtixfire i'm volunteering to help mentor celtix

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

> 1) Is CeltiXFire planning to create an intermediary runtime or support > endpoints or both? CeltiXfire is focused on service creation and service consumption capabilities at the endpoint. The architecture is flexible enough to be used in either way - we are not trying to build to a particular

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project > > > (can you please fix your mailer to >* not break email threading >* wrap lines > thanks!) > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:44:36PM -0400, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote: > > > ? The one JSR mentioned above is

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

FYI, I updated the wiki page [1] to remove the item "Official Build System". I will look into Apache Gump for this purpose. [1] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal thanks, Adi > -Original Message- > From: Sakala, Adinarayana > Sent: Wednesday, Ju

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

iki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal [2] - http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/index.html Regards, Adi Sakala > -Original Message- > From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:31 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject:

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

Hi Yoav, > I do think it's useful. If it's a pain to update the proposal to > reflect these individual associations, I apologize. Nope not a pain at all. We will goahead and update the proposal on the wiki[1] to reflect both the affiliation and the project they contributed to. [1] - http://wiki

RE: [PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

fire Project > > > Hola, > Cool overall. Would it be possible to detail the affiliations of the > (relatively large) initial committers, so that we can tell how homo- > or heterogeneous that community is at the moment? > > Yoav > > On 6/20/06, Sakala, Adinarayana &

[PROPOSAL] CeltiXfire Project

Hello, Below is a project proposal for incubation consideration. The project welcomes your feedback as well as interest in involvement. This proposal is also located online at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CeltiXfireProposal == CeltiXfire Proposal == Project CeltiXfire is a SOA infrastruct

RE: May Status report?

How about this text for the report? "Project just started incubation. CLAs are on file for the initial committers. A CCLA has been received for the initial contributions of Java ORB implementation and the code has been imported into SVN repository. Mailing lists, subversion repository, and JIR