+1 (non binding)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Please vote on the acceptance of JENA into the incubator. The proposal can
>> be found at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/JenaProposal and is copied
>> belo
Hi Jeremy
One of Clerezza aims was to use an RDF api that is maximally close to RDF
abstract syntax and semantics, on this RDF core api we have different
façades and utilities as well as a frontend adapter implementing the jena
API. Related standards like SPARQL and the various serialization forma
Hi
To have a better overview how the different project are supposed to be
different I've started a wiki-page to compare the features:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SemanticComparison#preview
At the current state it is in no way objective, but to me it would help to
see what is most likely to
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
> wrote:
> > ...The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable
> set of
> > components for semantic content managem
(restarting thread with general@incubator.apache.org hoping for a broader
discussion)
Hello
The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of
components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one
of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and s
We are having the same problem in Clerezza, one of the dependencies that
isn't in the central repo is sesame 2 [1]. I think we have the following
options:
- not include the sesame backend in the default distribution (users who need
it would have to compile it their selves of download it from elsew
