re: [VOTE] Graduation of the Empire-db Podling

Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Empire-db Project: > > * Martijn Dashorst > * Francis De Brabandere > *

re: [DISCUSS] Graduating empire?

Hi Dave, I have been with the project from the beginning and so far we have accepted one new comitter per year - after we felt that they have shown their comittment submitting patches for some time. So in total we have had 3 new comitters since incubation and they are all still active. However

re: [DISCUSS] Graduating empire?

Hi all, thanks Jukka for your view on this issue and thank you Benson for bringing this topic up. I am one of the Empire-db committers and certainly we would appreciate it very much if there is a way for us to graduate. It is true that we are a small community of around 5 regularly active comm

[VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.2.0-incubating (rc1)

Hi, The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.2.0-incubating release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. With this release we have made a major API change removing unrecommended legacy features that have been non-standard Java. The API now is much cle

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4)

+1 Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.6-incubating (rc4) > > Hi, > > We have just prepared the fourth 2.0.6-incubating release candidate > and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > > PMC vote thread: > http://mail-arch

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb wrote: > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6) > > On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote: > > Hi sebb, > > > > we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since > everything but the timestam

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

Hi sebb, we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it a minor and not blocking issue. We're still relying on your vote a

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > Hi Rainer, > > > The only difference I could find, was that the zip additionally contains > 5 empty directories that are not present in the tar. But the number and > content of the files do match. > > c

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

Hi Sebb, thanks for checking our release once again but I was shocked to read about your verdict. However I have problems to reproduce your findings. I have downloaded both the zip and the tar from http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ The only difference I could find, was that the zi

re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5)

+1 (non-binding unfortunately). Any IPMC members willing to have a look at this release? Thanks, Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) > > Hi, > > The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is > now looking for

re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2)

Francis I think we can delete that "old" directory tree in the trunk. Rainer Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Re: [VOTE] Release Empire-db version 2.0.5-incubating (take 2) > > [inline reply] > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, sebb wrote: > > > The new release candidate uses exactly the same n

re: [DISCUSS] Changing poddling release voting process

I agree with Martijn's view on the first release of a podling which is much more critical than subsequent releases. But for subsequent releases the voting process should be simplified in one way or the other. At the moment we have to get approval from our Mentors first before we can move to th

[VOTE] Release Empire-db 2.0.5

The Empire-db community has completed working on Release 2.0.5 and is now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. So far the release has been approved by Empire-db committers, but due to vacation time and other circumstances the Mentors are unable to review the release. Hence i

re: New Incubator Proposal: Null - A cloud-aware Web 3.0 Container

Excellent proposal. I am totally convinced of the superiority of the approach. In fact I already have an idea for interoperability plug-in that will allow access to any SOAP 1.3 capable service. I have already some code in Java that I am currently converting to Null. My suggestion for the title

Empire-db on the November podling board report

Hi Martijn, Hi Niclas, I was also surprised not to find Empire-db on the November report list. Because I had planned on writing the report all week I added it anyway before actually reading your E-Mails. So it is now in there (see http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008

[Report] October Report for Empire-db

belonging to the empire-db development team. A few requests have been answered. Rainer Döbele - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round

Why not leave all licenses as separate files but put them in a subfolder called "licenses"? That would serve both of you. This is clearly my first choice. Rainer ant.elder wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:2

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release, 2nd round

+1 (non binding unfortunately) Rainer Jörg Reiher wrote: > Hello, > > the community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating and > apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating. > > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy we would now like > to request the

Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease

L PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 19:48 > An: Rainer Döbele > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: [VOTE]apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire- > struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubatingrelease > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubatingandapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

anyone know where to obtain distributable versions of the servlet-api.jar and jsp-api.jar from? The only implementations I know come from Sun Microsystems and are under CDDL License. Rainer Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:31 +0200, Rainer Döbele wrote:

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.4-incubating andapache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.4-incubating release

Hi Henning, thanks for your vote. Here are a few answers to your comments: Testing is currently performed by running the two example applications provided with the distribution, which contain various tasks. Each of them is run once for each supported database, and the logs are checked. This ha

Re: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

Hi Thomas, thanks very much for your detailed analysis. It's a shame we missed that on our empire-db-dev vote. Jörg has already commented about the md5 and sha file format. As far as I understand it, there are two major problems with the empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3 release: 1. the missing freemar

RE: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

Hi Martijn you're absolutely right. The build.xml should go in the root directory in the future. I have already created a JIRA task for it https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-9 Thanks. Rainer Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > I haven't looked closely at the release yet (I'll try to grab

RE: [VOTE] apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating release

Since no one else seems to vote here, I do. Here's my +1 (non binding) Rainer Jörg Reiher wrote: > Hello, > > The community has approved a release of apache-empire-db-2.0.3-incubating > > and apache-empire-struts2-ext-1.0.3-incubating. > > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Po

AW: Empire-DB Incubation Status

usen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 10:57 An: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Rainer Döbele; Matthew Bond; Jörg Reiher; Manuel Gamerdinger; Thomas Fischer; Martijn Dashorst Betreff: Empire-DB Incubation Status Hi, Current status: - ICLAS for Rainer, Matthew and Manuel

Empire-db release 2.0.2 ready for incubation

Before we (hopefully) enter the Apache Incubator we have completed pending development tasks on Empire-db and Empire-Struts2-Extentsions which are now available on SourceForge.net with release 2.0.2 (Empire-db) respectively release 1.0.2 (Empire-Struts2-Extentsions). The most significant impro

Re: [PROPOSAL] Empire-db

Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Empire-dbProposal Martijn Dashorst wrote: > I find this alarming: when there are no new challenges awaiting the > project, why join Apache? The code is stable and mature, you can just > leave it at sf.net. There doesn't seem to be a plan other than "

AW: [PROPOSAL] Empire-db

Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> Inexperience with Open Source: >> Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only >> been publicly available since January 2008. > >This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.org [1] website I >find this quote: > >"In summer 200

RE: [PROPOSAL] Empire-db

Martijn Dashorst wrote: >> Inexperience with Open Source: >> Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only >> been publicly available since January 2008. > >This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.org [1] website I >find this quote: > >"In summer 200

Champion wanted for Empire-db project

Hello everyone, We would like to donate our relational data persistence component called Empire-db to the apache software foundation. According to the Incubator documentation we need to find a Champion who can help us with the incubation process. Even though with iBatis, JDO and Torgue there a