+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
>
>
> From: Joe Stein
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Samza into the Incubator
>
>
> +1 (non-bindi
PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Normally the vote takes place on both lists simultaneously and all the
> votes are aggregated. Can you aggregate all the votes? Thanks!
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
> > Hi,
Murthy wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified sigs, checked NOTICE and ran tests.
>
> Arun
>
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kafka community is excited to share RC 9 for release of
>> Kafka-0.7.0-incubating. In the inte
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share RC 9 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating. In the interest of saving time, and with the
expectation that the one-liner change will pass the vote on
kafka-users@, we will run a vote in parallel here.
Vote thread http://markmail.org/message/sefgr5lxccty4tjz?
Sebb,
This makes sense. We will fix the NOTICE file and restart the VOTE on
general@ today.
Thanks for the feedback!
-Neha
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 December 2011 18:51, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kafka community is excited to share tha
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC 8 for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating
release. This is the first release of Kafka since we've joined the
Apache incubator.
Vote thread ht
Folks,
Thanks for giving feedback on the LICENSE and NOTICE file issues. We've
worked on the feedback and would appreciate if you could take a look and
see if there are no red flags.
Please find the LICENSE, NOTICE files and release artifacts for the next RC
here -
http://people.apache.org/~nehan
for MIT and Nunit license. Didn't include it for the
SCALA license for a project that is written in scala. Also didn't include
it for the Apache license for an Apache incubator project.
Hope that sounds reasonable.
Thanks,
Neha
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:43 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 1 Dece
Also, we haven't ignored the fact that the NOTICE file must ideally be as
short as possible.
To track this issue, we've filed a bug -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-219 and will be fixing it for
the next release.
Thanks,
Neha
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Neha Nark
Hi,
The Kafka community is hoping to get some feedback on the updated NOTICE
and LICENSE files for Kafka, before we post a new vote for it.
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/NOTICE
http://people.apache.org/~nehanarkhede/LICENSE
The previous vote thread or release artifacts are here -
http:/
So, you are saying option 2 is a reasonable choice, given that only the
NOTICE/LICENSE files have changed one line here and there ?
Thanks,
Neha
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 5:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 7:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> On 11/29/2011 4
Hi,
The context for this is the discussion here -
http://markmail.org/message/rsxjgrrufc6khlqy?q=overhead+list:org.apache.incubator.general
This was a long discussion with no clear answers.
We would like to know if it is OK to either -
1. shorten the release VOTE for change to one non-code file
>> One "shortcut" that can be taken when a /single file/ must be changed
(and as discussed on the list, that change already has consensus),
would be to roll the next candidate on a shorter 24 approval clock,
provided that everyone had full opportunity to review the candidate,
and that rest of the p
Until then, we'd like to stick to
branch revision. We've seen many other projects doing that.
If anyone has any other comments on this RC, please raise it now.
Thanks,
Neha
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote
>> That is because, every single time, the RM agreed that the release
was worth re-cutting.
We have been assuming that it is the rule of Apache to cut another RC even
if it gets a single -1 vote.
>> A majority of +1's over -1's is required, obviously :)
Although this seems reasonable, do people
t; >>> On Nov 24, 2011, at 1:59 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
> >>>&g
es take 72 hours.
>
> Anyway, I've found some problems in the NOTICE file in that Kafka
> uses/ship NUnit but it's not in the NOTICE file.
>
> -1
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator. Please
try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating release. This is
the first release of Kafka since we've joined the Apache incubator.
Based on the feed
Hi,
Kafka community is excited to share that RC for release of
Kafka-0.7.0-incubating has been +1'd over at kafka-user@incubator.
Please try it out and vote for the Apache Kafka 0.7.0-incubating release.
This is the first release of Kafka since we've joined the Apache incubator.
Vote thread
http:
19 matches
Mail list logo
