Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-07 Thread Mu Li
hat the ASF > > > provides, we ship a number of messaging systems that may be better > from a > > > licensing stand point - ActiveMQ, RocketMQ, Pulsar. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 3:27 PM Mu Li wrote: > > > >

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Mu Li
MXNet's backend is written in C++, which is not able to use the java interface. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Are you guys able to use this (which is what we use in Apache Toree)? > > https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq > > Which has been successfully relicensed? > https

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-06 Thread Mu Li
It's optional for MXNet to use ZeroMQ. Even if it is enabled, the source codes of MXNet will not contain any codes from ZeroMQ except for "include" and calling zeromq's APIs. But if we want to ship the binary, it will link against libzeromq.a On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-09 Thread Mu Li
would bolster the growing user and > developer community around MXNet. That community includes around 200 > contributors from academia and industry. The core developers of our project > are listed in our contributors below and are also represented by logos on > the mxnet.io site including