Re: [ANNOUNCE] Christian Müller joins the IPMC

Congrats! :) On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Christian Müller < christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the warm welcome. Because I'm a newbie here, be aware of stupid > questions... ;-) > > Best, > Christian > Am 03.10.2013 08:02 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" : > > > Congrats! > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Jake Farrell joins the Incubator PMC

Welcome aboard On Sep 6, 2013 2:55 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > Hi Folks, > > The IPMC has VOTEd to add Jake Farrell as an Apache Incubator PMC. > > Welcome Jake! > > --David > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@inc

Re: Change of Chair

Thanks Benson for all what you have done for the IPMC On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Welcome, Marvin! :) > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senio

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept Stratos as an Apache Incubation Project

Hi The proposal is well detailed and very informative, the purpose of the projects fits ASF's Cloud Ecosystem and the community is very promising already reminds me with the one of ACS. Very looking forward to start rolling the podling tasks On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Christian Grobme

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Spark for the Incubator

Hi On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Marvin > > > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) >> wrote: >> > Note: we

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Spark for the Incubator

Hi Marvin On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) > wrote: > > Note: we discussed adding Roman before the VOTE and it was > > fine with the incoming Spark community, so Roman is now on > > the wiki for the proposal. > > >

Re: Looking for a Champion

interested to be a Champion and take it from there [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StratosProposal On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >> +1 @Marcel >> >> Any links for the draft proposal so peopl

Re: Looking for a Champion

+1 @Marcel Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or not ? On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans < marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote: > I would never search for a generic job scheduling application in the > Wicket project. I still don't know exactly w

Re: Looking for a Champion

nd to whom. Is there any > assistance you can offer with that? > Sure I would like to do that, but I suggest to take that off this list as this is more for discussing new projects coming into Incubator hoping to get back to it when the project is ready for that > > > On Tue, May 7

Re: Looking for a Champion

Hi Tom The proposal looks pretty interesting on the technical level indeed, but when it comes to ASF it is more about building (or trying to guarantee) of community around a project so it can continue and evolve and does not die, in terms of the code being maintained and used Yes Incubator is

Re: [VOTE] Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator

s no cryptographic algorithms, but it does provide the > > ability for people to plug in various cryptographic libraries. > > > > == Required Resources == > > > > === Mailing lists === > > > > * jclouds-dev: for development discussions > > * jclouds-user:

Re: [PROPOSAL] jclouds Proposal for Incubator

Hi Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Apr 16, 2013 9:20 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Rebecca Wood wrote: > > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose the jclouds project to the Incubator. The jclouds Proposal is available at: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Onami as TLD

+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi all, > > Apache Onami entered incubation before more than 3 months. Since then > the community has proven to be pretty active and healthy. > > A few releases were made and the status page has been completed: > http://i

Re: [VOTE] Apache Onami to become an ASF TLD

Hi On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > ...I followed this: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote > > "It is wise to copy the incubator general list when the vote is >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Onami to become an ASF TLD

Hi I totally agree that it can be a source of confusion, but I used to either FWD or send a different copy to general@ for notification and I thought others do the same On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 6:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > On

Re: [VOTE] Apache Onami to become an ASF TLD

opy the general@ when such vote(s) are proposed On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 18.03.2013 11:35, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > Hi > > > >Last time I checked the rules it state that, for such votes, the IPMC > > should be *notified* t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Onami to become an ASF TLD

Hi Last time I checked the rules it state that, for such votes, the IPMC should be *notified* through general@ On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 18.03.2013 11:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Christian Grobmeier > > wro

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

Hi On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > We're also missing Ant Elder from the Nominated Mentors list no? > Fixed > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:45 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Edward J. Yoon > >wrote: > > > > > The required action has bee

Re: [VOTE] Graduate CloudStack from Incubator

Stack is active, healthy, and growing and > has > > demonstrated the ability to self-govern using accepted Apache practices. > > > > After holding a discussion [4][5], the Apache CloudStack community > subsequently > > voted overwhelmingly to graduate [6], collecting 55

Re: [INVALID][RESULT][VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

Hi On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > > Are the five binding votes from IPMC members? > > > > It is not 5. > > For the record, there were 4 binding IPMC votes in favor. > > Mohammed Nour El-Din > Alex Karasulu >

Re: [PROPOSAL] MRQL for the Apache Incubator

I added myself as a mentor. Welcome aboard. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > I think it's time to call for vote. > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > Nice proposal indeed, I'd say having 3 mentors is usually better to avoid > > release headache

Re: [VOTE] Accept MRQL into the Incubator

+1 On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Dear ASF members, > I would like to call for a VOTE for acceptance of MRQL into the Incubator. > The vote will close on Monday March 11, 2013. > > [ ] +1 Accept MRQL into the Apache incubator > [ ] +0 Don't care. > [ ] -1 Don't accept

Re: Patches from contributors: missing ASF license inclusion?

Sorry about my false answer then, I take it back On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote: > This is clear now, there is no room for doubt. > > Thanks ! > > Matthieu > > > On Mar 4, 2013, at 14:42 , Benson Margulies wrote: > > > You DO NOT NEED AN ICLA from these people. > > > > Und

Re: Patches from contributors: missing ASF license inclusion?

Hi On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Matthieu Morel wrote: > Hi, > > In the S4 project we have some recent patches from non-committers, but we > have doubts on how to integrate them. > > In the past, the Jira system had a clearly defined way for the contributor > to mark the patch as granted to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Provisionr into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Mar 4, 2013 8:07 AM, "kishore g" wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Ashish wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

Hi I would like to help and hence added myself as a mentor. Thanks for bringing the project to Apache. On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Andrei Savu wrote: > Hi David - > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > I am interested in this. I know one or two things about pupp

Re: [PROPOSAL] BeanShell join the Apache Incubator

The proposal looks interesting. I also added my self as a mentor. Good luck. On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi there, > > the BeanShell project, the long living JSR-274 reference > implementation, would like to join the Apache Incubator - I started > preparing a proposa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating

Hi Branko... On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 03.02.2013 21:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Just to be clear, in the case of Onami Logging, reviewers are asked to > >> find the right package amongst 8 different source packages in 8 > >> different directories. > > W

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating

+1 (binding) On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Good morning IPMC, > > The Apache Onami community has voted[1] the release of Apache > Onami-Logging 3.4.0-incubating, collecting two IPMC votes from members > Olivier Lamy and Christian Grobmeier. > > This is the changelist:

Re: Please help us release 2 Onami artifacts

Hi... On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > On 01/02/13 04:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> we need one more binding vote for the two running votings on Onami: >> http://people.apache.org/~**brane/incubator-votes.html

Re: Cloudstack report signoffs

Hi Re-reviewed the report and re-signed it On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:31 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > If I read the diffs correctly, Joe just posted an update to the report > > which removed all the mentor signoffs. > > > > Was th

Re: Do all releases need to go to /dist?

Hi I agree about how policy should change. But when it comes to apply on this case I believe we have to read the release rules carefully and we will see that we don't need policy change we just need to add more details and hence make it more clear The release rules assume you are release sour

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Onami parent 1-incubating

+1 (binding) On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I voted on the dev list, but here is my +1 as IPMC > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as > > Apache Onami pare

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

+1 (binding) Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Nov 14, 2012 6:36 PM, "Ryan Baxter" wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, James M Snell wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler < rgard...@opendirective.com > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

Hi Bertrand... On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: > > ...I am submitting a proposal that has been open for discussion for some > > days (with the former name of Mayhem), so now submitting for a vote > > for thi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

Hi On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > NOTE: I still see some mayhem in confluence and jira. I don't have access > to my laptop now would u please update the proposal ? > Checked again at [1]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

are License, Version 2.0 > > * SLF4J - released under the MIT License > > > > == Test Dependencies == > > > > * JUnit - released under the Common Public License Version 1.0 > > * Easymock - released under The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 > > * Mockit

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi Christian... Isn't that a step that should be done before graduation, in other words this should not stop going with the Incubator acceptance [VOTE] ? On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Putting trademarks into the loop. > > Trademark people, any comments to Simon

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

in my ex-company we used two different approaches, we were using mercurial but the same concepts apply here 1- use one repo and have branches for each component in which u make changes and then we merge that back into the main/default branch from which we make releases 2- have different repo for

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi Simone... On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Mohammed! > > > IMO it would be easier to move into a Git repository, which I will help > in > > setting it up. IMO, it will also be helpful for ASF Git support to have > > more projects using Git which will help us understan

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

imo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: > > Hi > > > > I noticed that the code is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

; wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Eric Charles wrote: > > I tried to add myself to the 'Other interested people' on the wiki, but I > > have not the right to edit the page. > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi I noticed that the code is hosted on github but u r asking for an svn rep while we can have a git repo, or u don't want to continue using git ? Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Nov 1, 2012 11:59 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" wrote: > > Hi Simone &

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

Hi Simone I like the idea pretty much and I would like to be a mentor of this project. But I can't edit the wiki page at the moment would u please add me :) Thanks for bringing the project to ASF Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Nov 1, 2012 10:30 AM, "Eric Charles" wr

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

Hi On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: >> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings >> live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"? > > Not at all. I'd even be fin

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

+1 Good idea On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > I like it - > that will simplify migrations > 12.10.2012 11:31 пользователь "Daniel Shahaf" > написал: > >> Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings >> live at domains of the form "${podling}.in

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Isis podling from Apache Incubator

[x] +1 Graduate Isis podling from Apache Incubator On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dan Haywood > wrote: >> This is a call for vote to graduate the Isis podling from Apache Incubator. > > [x] +1 Graduate Isis podling from Apache Inc

Re: Fwd: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2012 ([ppmc])

Hi Noah... This reminder is for collecting reports which is early enough as the reports are discussed at board meeting 3rd Wednesday from each month. Before reports were collected just one week before the board meeting and some of them were too late to submit there reports and hence the IPMC ca

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

t; >> If you do wish to release IDE build files, I suggest you release them >> as separate files, e.g. under >> >> res/ide-support/eclipse >> res/ide-support/netbeans >> >> etc. >> >> The files can be named >> >> eclipse.classpath >

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

op these files, yet developers who >>> download our source release loose a useful code navigation tool without >>> these files. >>> 14.09.2012 16:46 пользователь "Jim Jagielski" написал: >>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2012, at 5:02 AM,

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

nfiguration >> settings over to Maven over the course of time and let Maven generate >> the Eclipse project-specific files. >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> wrote: >>> Hi Marcel... >>

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

Hi Marcel... On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:24 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov >> wrote: >>> 14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь "Mohammad Nour El-Din&qu

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

Hi Alexei... On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Hello Mohammad, thank you for the review. > > Eclipse can be considered as an alternative build system, so these files > are like build.xml files. Why not to keep them in release? > 14.09.2012 3:46 пользователь

Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

Hi I checked: - Mailing lists and from it the community looks active to a good extent both on the users and developers lists - Last report (June 2012) they were in the 'No Release' group of podlings but they managed to get a release out - Their progress is not that fast but it is stable and ste

Re: September Reports

Hi On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. > wrote: >>>-Original Message- >>>From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, Sep

Bigtop - A Shepherd's View

Hi... The Bigtop community look they doing pretty good and already in their final steps of graduating. -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein -

Re: September Reports

> >>Hi, >> >>On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> wrote: >>> I have some time tonight is there something I can help in ? >> >>Sure, thanks! It would be great if you could take a look at some of >>the following reports un

Re: September Reports

Hi Jukka... 1st of all congrats on the new house :) I have some time tonight is there something I can help in ? On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> I can do it tonight, but I completely missed the as

Re: Etch, Isis, NPanday and Wave missing reports

Taking a look at it On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: > Hi Jukka, > I've just added a report for Isis this morning. Still needs signing off by > one of our mentors. > Thx > Dan > ~~~ > > On 8 September 2012 09:50, Jukka Zitting wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please report ASAP

Re: [VOTE] Accept Drill into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I would like to call a vote for accepting Drill for incubation in the > > Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Discussion > > over the last few days h

Re: Incubator release task force

Hi Gary... On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > As someone who is currently attempting to go through their first release, > I am not really in the category of someone who could be in such a > taskforce. However, I am very interested in seeing an improvement in the > release docum

Re: Incubator release task force

I like the idea, but I suggest to do it in a different way: Why not to have volunteers who are already mentoring different podlings with different sizes of both number of people and the size of code base, these mentors then volunteer: 1- Update the release process docs 2- Report their their exper

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Jul 20, 2012 7:47 PM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote: > > I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the > > Apache Incubator. The full proposal i

RE: [PROPOSAL] Blur for the Apache Incubator

A pretty cool project and from what I have read in the proposal and the other links I believe the project will do prefect in the incubator phase and will be a perfect addition to ASF. Good luck. Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Jul 18, 2012 9:00 PM, "Chen, Pei" wrote: >

Re: Incubation state transitions and stuck projects (Was: February report review)

Hi Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Jul 16, 2012 1:41 PM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler > wrote: > > This is great stuff. It implies the ComDev PPMC ought to focus on the low > > diversity trap while Incubator focuses o

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] Fediz for the Apache Incubator

ay for your proposal ! > > Regards > JB > > > On 07/03/2012 12:37 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >> Hi Jean... >> >> I added myself, lets go for a [VOTE] :) >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >wrote: >>

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] Fediz for the Apache Incubator

Hi Jean... I added myself, lets go for a [VOTE] :) On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > To be able to start a formal vote, we need an additional mentor. > > Is someone interested ? > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > > On 11/11/2011 11:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste On

Re: [Discuss] Apache Steve

Looks good to me +1 :) On Jun 30, 2012 12:28 PM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > This so far has lead us to the conclusion that there really isn't any > > "incubating" that needs to be done. > > > > I'd like to open the topic up for discuss

Re: Board will be proposing a new TLP

+1 on the proposal itself and how it will go directly through the board I also agree /w what has been said and replied to by both Emmanuel & Alex On Jun 30, 2012 3:32 PM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > > Le 6/30/12 2:23 PM, Jim Jagielski a

Re: [VOTE] [PROPOSAL] Allura to enter the Incubator

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 2012/6/21 Rich Bowen : > > Hi, > > > > We are proposing Allura to be admitted to the Apache Incubator, and > would like to request that the IPMC votes on this issue. The requisite 72 > hours has passed since th

Re: [DISCUSS] Prototype ASF Mailing List Request form

Nice work Sam ;) May I suggest adding some fields to ease data entry even more: 1- A checkbox indicating whether or not the mailing list is for an incubator project or not 2- Another list of checkboxes which are enabled only when the incubator checkbox is enabled: 2.1- Dvelopment 2.2- Commits

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

l have a point, but lets give it a try and adjust the idea along the way :), maybe come up with another idea if this didn't work out > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On May 5, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > > Hi Alan > > > > For sure you

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

Hi Alan For sure your point may be valid, but the whole point, if you read the whole thread from the beginning, which I am sure you did, you will notice that Jukka mentioned that this is a start and will assess the effort and the whole plan after giving it sometime. And actually having other pe

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

of the meeting. The hope is that all reports have been > reviewed by (all) the Directors beforehand, so we don't have to discuss > them in detail during the meeting. We stop and discuss when a Director > leaves a flag/query/concern in the report comments. > > Cheers, > -g &

Re: Shepherds for podling reports

Hi Jukka... I also added myself, but as being a Mentor of CloudStack I would rather take (shepherdZ: DeltaSpike, Nuvem, Wink) while Dave Fisher takes (shepherdY: CloudStack, NPanday, VCL) Dave would you please ACK that ? On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

I believe this [VOTE] is ready to be wrapped up Kevin ;) On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > > > Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the > Incubator. The proposal is available at [1] and I have also

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack for Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > +1: accept CloudStack into Incubator > (binding) > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > > > > --**--**- > To unsubscribe, e-m

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator

Hi On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > I updated the proposal at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CloudStackProposal. I have included > the embedded source dependencies, binary dependencies, and contributor > e-mail addresses. There are some open questions in the dependencie

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > > The proposal looks good. I'm excited that the community is looking to > > grow at the ASF. I'm working on similar technology in my day job at IBM > > and am interested in getting

Re: CloudStack Incubation proposal

Hi... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > > > >> On 03.04.2012 20:10, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> > >>> Oh come on... 1st of all, it's a joke. > >> > >> One I do not

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator

Hi... On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Kevin Kluge > wrote: > > Citrix is pursuing patents based on prior CloudStack work and expects to > continue to do > > so in the future. Citrix is getting these patents to protect the > CloudStack u

Re: [PROPOSAL][RFC] CloudStack for the Apache Incubator

Hi The proposal looks good, I used to work for [1] and I am so interested to see a cloud software donated to ASF. I am also willing to help so I added my self as a mentor. [1] - http://www.aserver.com On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Kevin

Re: CloudStack?

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > Hi All, thanks for the interest in CloudStack. I'm working on the wiki > page at this moment. I'll send out a proposal notice later today. > Then hurry up, cause we are looking forward to it ;) > > -kevin > > > -Original Message- >

Re: CloudStack?

Quoting: "...will become the first cloud platform in the industry to be submitted to the Apache Software Foundation ,..." They mentioned that it is "to be submitted" The title is misleading, I am not sure if that is a problem ? Is it ? On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Nóir

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

> >> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Kulp > wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:13:30 AM Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: > >> > > > Hi Daniel... > >> > > > > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

Hi... On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Alex Karasulu > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > >> Has nothing to do with incubation. You're talking about Foundation-wide > >> policy. You cannot impose differe

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > Has nothing to do with incubation. You're talking about Foundation-wide > > policy. You cannot impose different naming rules on podlings, than what > is > > imposed on TLPs. Please se

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi Greg... On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Feb 29, 2012 7:32 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" > wrote: > > > > Hi Greg... > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > >... > > > They remain. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

s > imposed on TLPs. Please see my response in the original thread. You need a > Board resolution and rationale. > > -g > On Feb 29, 2012 5:03 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" > wrote: > > > I don't see that this getting to any clear end yet. So I sugges

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi Greg... On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Feb 29, 2012 4:15 AM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:13:30 AM Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:

[DISCUSS] - Packages renaming and backward compatibility (was: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator)

sulu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > wrote: > > > On the other hand, I totally respect that Cloudera's interest to > support > > > their customers and p

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi Daniel... On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > We had a very similar discussion about the back word compatibility > classes/package names when Subversion graduated and we deemed it OK for > them. > In fact, I believe they still of org.tigris packages in their codebase long

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi all... I don't think that anyone here is trying to underestimate or saying anything bad about Sqoop in general or about Cloudera people in particular. And I agree on the point that this vote was more about evaluating whether the Sqoop community succeeded to adapt to the Apache way of doing

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 02/28/2012 01:46 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >> Hi... >> >>1st of all, and I speaking about myself here, I believe this is >> partially my fault cause I am one of the mentors of Sqoop and I should

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi... 1st of all, and I speaking about myself here, I believe this is partially my fault cause I am one of the mentors of Sqoop and I should have spotted such thing before moving the vote to general@ I totally agree with Alex, more specifically I believe this is easy to solve. There is no pro

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Good catch On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > The source code in Sqoop still exists in both com.cloudera.sqoop and > org.apache.sqoop packages and most of the code appears to include the > com.cloudera packages and not the org.apache packages. While in the > incubator this see

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Lucy to TLP

Yeah I am sorry thats my mistake :) On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:27:31AM +0100, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > 1st of all congrats. > > Thanks! > > > I have only one question/comment, in the charter draft why you

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Lucy to TLP

Sorry about this last e-mail my wrong, this is part of the charter template! On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi... > >1st of all congrats. I have only one question/comment, in the charter > draft why you call it &q

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation of Lucy to TLP

Hi... 1st of all congrats. I have only one question/comment, in the charter draft why you call it "Apache Lucy Project" why not just "Apache Lucy" ? On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1, amen to that, brother. > > Time to Lucy

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache Incubator

Hi :) On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Oh Mohammad, > > On Feb 21, 2012, at 2:06 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > > > Hi Matt... > > s/Matt/Chris/ > > > > > Allow me to disagr

  1   2   3   4   >