Noel, re: lack of updated quarterly report content from this year -- I
sent the following quarterly report to general@incubator.apache.org for
Beehive on 4/26/2005. Not sure why it didn't make it into records, I
may have cut the deadline a little close?
- Forwarded Message-
From: Ke
+1
-Original Message-
From: Richard Feit
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:20 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
+1 !
Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
> Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
>
>
>
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie O'Neil
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:02 PM
> To: Beehive Developers; general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release
>
> All--
>
>The blocking bugs have been dealt with and we've been adding
> documentation a
Beehive is in the home stretch of its 1.0-level release; we declared a
beta release in March, and are on track to deliver a 1.0 in the late May
timeframe. Posting automated daily builds continues to be an challenge,
but otherwise infrastructure is well in place. At this point we are
largely focus
+1
Kyle Marvin: +1
Eddie O'Neil: +1
James Song: +1
Heather Stephens: +1
Daryl Olander:+1
Steven Tocco: +1
Bryan Che:+1
-Original Message-----
From: Ken Tam
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 1:37 PM
To: Beehive Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [vo
Per
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases%0
D, Beehive formally requests that the Incubator PMC approve a beta
release as described below.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Tam
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 1:37 PM
To: Beehive Developers; [EMAIL PROTECTED
