congrats!
do we now get a 1.7 release asap? ;)
I really like the features that where proposed!
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:16, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ASF Board just voted to approve the graduation of Subversion from
> the Incubator. We are now an official project of the Apache Softw
> I was away at ApacheCon (with fairly lousy 'net access, sadly)... I just
> updated Lucene.Net's April report.
>
>
not my experience, i found the connection pretty good and fast (even upload)
johan
+1 (binding :))
On 6/20/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We just received confirmation that the Board has established Apache
Wicket as a project.
I would like to thank the Incubator PMC and all the others that have
supported Wicket during the incubation for their guidance, effo
cool..
if we also could personalize it a bit more (for example the project name on
the back or front)
it would be even better.
johan
On 5/9/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
["We Survived the Apache Incubator and All I Got Was This Stupid T-Shirt"]
i think graduation t-sh
IMHO the current process is fine but needs to be documented better.
Podlings should be encouraged to release stuff that they think is
usable outside their small world of developers who check out from svn
and build from source. The incubator is set up to review and approve
releases without passing
aargg
wicket community is divided again! Amsterdam or The Hague, The Hague or
Amsterdam!
Utrecht is also pretty nice! ;)
johan
On 4/4/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be good to know that on 30th April, there is Queensday
> (Dutch guys know how to celebrate... :))
It
For the record: JIRA made our users very happy. They have been asking
for it almost from the start and for some reason we always got
complaints about the SF issue tracker.
If only JIRA didn't mess with the subjects when sending updates for a
issue
johan
IRC works fine for the cases we use it. It is direct feedback that is really
wanted in
discussions. And ofcourse when a code/design thing is discussed the list is
also
asked for it what they think.
i personally can't, or not happy to, do without it. I know what will happen
if we didn't use irc
w
+1 with these statement.
Finally one that really makes sense in my eyes
johan
On 8/15/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you can either acknowledge that some people prefer to use IRC
to communicate, and accept that while it isn't the best medium, or
the one
you would choose, it is th
On 8/10/06, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 06:03:52PM -0700, Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>> Seems that Apache (myself included) doesn't
>> like IRC so much because it is not available to those of us who
>> because of time zone or other reaso
Your very welcome on the wicket lists. And i do like that you choose 2.0
I would really like much more feedback of users of the 2.0 trunk!
johan
On 8/1/06, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> hi Ross, great to hear you are enjoying wicket so much but i also hope
you
The feeling i get from the mail below is that incubator releases are not
really meant for all end users.. You really only want the users that really
knows that it is an incubator release.
But for me wicket-2.0 will be a full release a real release that every user
of
wicket should be able to use j
What is the current track record?
I mean there are a lot of projects that have done the same thing. What is
the best/worsed and the average?
johan
Does anyone here have an idea what the shortest time is that a new
community might be incubated (assuming no other issues)?
imho, i would much rather see wicket-1.2.2 rather then
wicket-incubating-1.2.2 as a release. to me incubating says "not ready for
production use". it might mean something different in the apache context
but
we cant expect all our existing users or those who stumble upon wicket for
the first time t
> * Chris Turner is from the UK and works as an independent consultant.
> He does not intend to move with us to Apache.
What does that mean? Does he not think wicket should move to apache? Does
he not want to sign a CLA? Is there consensus within wicket on this move
or isn't there?
Chris is
15 matches
Mail list logo
