Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 Release

2017-09-06 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
ications, and decision making process have > stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF > projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection > of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate > that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. > > -- Dominic Divakaruni 206.475.9200 Cell

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

2017-08-30 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
> > > > KEY files are available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ < > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/> > > > > > > For information about the contents of this release, see: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

2017-08-29 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
t have changed license. > > On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" < > dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the > committers > > for this project provide binding votes on gener

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0 release RC3

2017-08-29 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
release, see: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. > 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate> > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > Thanks. > > -- Dominic Divakaruni 206.475.9200 Cell

Re: Code contribution to Apache MXNet with a BSD 3 clause

2017-08-03 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
+general@incubator On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:22 AM Dominic Divakaruni < dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Legal-discuss@ to Bcc > > Thanks, John. The code will be part of Apache MXNet and our team will > commit to maintaining this. I will reach out to Apple, but I am not

Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet

2017-07-10 Thread Dominic Divakaruni
> > > compiling. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but > > > haven't > > > > > > made > > > > > > > much progress, though they did relicense JeroMQ (Java > > > > > > > wrapper/implementaiton) last year. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the last few months they've made a lot of progress towards > > > > > > relicensing: > > > > > > > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) > > to > > > > > > continue > > > > > > > using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the > > > trend > > > > > > > towards MPL 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any concerns before I do so? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dominic Divakaruni 206.475.9200 Cell