irmal Fernando (nirmal070...@apache.org)
>> Sajith Kariyawasam (saj...@apache.org)
>> Lahiru Sandaruwan (lahi...@apache.org)
>> Isuru Haththotuwa (isu...@apache.org)
>> Madhura Mendis (madh...@apache.org)
>> Mariangela Hills (mariang...@ap
+1.
Deepal
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Azeez
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Lahiru Sandaruwan wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> This is the forth release candidate for Apache Stratos 3.0.0-incubating,
>> the very first Stratos release at Apache.
>>
>> This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC vote [1] pass
> It's a community that brings the project. That community doesn't cease to
> exist just because it is subsumed into Apache. A TLP's community gets to
> decide who to accept as a new community member, based on merit (with the
> board's oversight to make sure it isn't dominated by a single comm
A true open source contributor does not have a CEO, and takes the
personal judgements not what CEO or someone asked you to do.
Deepal
> I was actually looking forward to contributing for this project where ever
> possible but I think people have misunderstood our intentions. As requested
> by my C
Apache is community over code, but here is more like code over community.
As a community we should be able to tolerate the conflicts of interest.
Once the project is incubated in Apache, the project belongs to Apache
and direction and future of the project should be decided by the
community, not
The Apache way is *"community over code"*, as a healthy community we
should encourage community growth. IMO I do not consider adding a new
member to the initial committer list as a big change to the proposal.
In fact, now I believe if we had a separate VOTE for him, we will not
have this much tra
+1.
Deepal
> I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
>
> I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
> the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
> policy. The acceptance or otherwise of the probationary TLP idea is a
Great to see WSO2 Stratos coming to Apache, and I would love to join/help
this project.
Deepal
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> It's with great pleasure that I invite the IPMC to review a new
> proposal [1] for the Apache Incubator. Please let us know if you have
> any que
+1,
Deepal
> +1
>
>
> Andrew
>
> On 06/07/2013 10:34 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> OK discussion has died down, time to VOTE to accept Spark into the
>> Apache Incubator. I'll let the VOTE run for at least a week.
>>
>> So far I've heard +1s from the following folks, so no
+1,
Deepal
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> +1 binding
>>
>> -- dims
>>
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 09, 2012 06:32:24 PM Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I
On 1/29/2012 3:09 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> +1
>> But shouldn't we agree on a rotationi/reelection before we do the
>> nominations?
> Christian, I hate to repeat myself, but could I direct your attention
> to my recent message? If you think that a rotation policy should come
> first, start a
If he has not resigned, why do we have this vote (or why started this
vote) ? forcing him to resign ?
Deepal
> I'd like to nominate Noel to continue as chair. Noel hasn't resigned,
> and we don't have a consensus on rotation. So I think any vote we hold
> to recommend a chair to the board should i
+1, definitely.
Deepal
> +1
>
> On 7 November 2011 22:53, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Opemeetings proposal has been discussed a few times here before. The group
>> of developers behind it worked hard (and succeeded) to address all potential
>> obstacles to the Incubator acceptance and to the foll
+1.
Deepal
> +1 (binding), with the caveat that I personally think it might be
> easier to split WS-Messenger off to the Axis PMC sooner rather than
> later if everyone feels like it will end up there anyway.
>
> As a side note - the W3C is looking for implementations of the WS-RA
> specs, which i
+1 for the proposal.
Deepal
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator.
>
> The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this mail.
> For those in a hurry here's a quick summary:
>
> Airavata is
+1
Deepal
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> +1
>
> Paul
>
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Ben Dewey wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M2 release of Apache
>>> Stonehe
+1
Deepal
> +1
>
>...ant
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:45 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
>> for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
>>
>> I _think_ I've added everybody who
Project look very interesting to me, so I would like to contribute too.
Deepal
> Carl,
>
> if you need additional mentors, count me in.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
>> On 05/07/2010 02:33 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> +1;
>>>
How about the website ? (I can not find any information about the
project, mentors, committers etc.. )
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/subversion.html
-Deepal
> There are two other issues to discuss for the Subversion podling:
>
> * moving the mailing lists directly to @subversion.apache.org
+1.
Thanks,
Deepal
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Kamaljit
Bath wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted to approve Ben Dewey as a committer
> for the Apache Stonehenge Incubator project. We are now asking the approval
> from the Incubator PMC for the same.
>
>
> Results
+1.
Thank you!
Deepal
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1
>
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:43 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
>> Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator
+1
- Deepal
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
> Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to
> publish the release.
>
> Stonehenge is a set of example applic
t; stonehenge-dev
>> *
>>
>> stonehenge-commits
>> *
>>
>> stonehenge-user
>>
>> Subversion Directory
>>
>> *
>>
>> [WWW] [WWW] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stonehenge
>>
>> Issue
I think we can keep this as the same level as Sandesha and Ramparrt. I
mean we do not have any modules other than core stuff under Axis2.
Deepal
> Serge,
>
> Unfortunately i won't be able to help much at this time due to time
> pressures. Hopefully one of my fellow PMC members may be interested i
Petar Tahchiev wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> today I was looking for a Jabber server implemented entirely in Java,
> and the only results
> that I got was this:
>
> ---(free)---
> http://www.codecobra.com/chime/
> http://www.open-im.net/
> http://www.tigase.org/
> http://www.igniterealtime.org/projects/ope
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>
>
>> Project name uniqueness should not be a criterion for Incubator
>> acceptance. I would even go further and say clear copyright
>> infringement is probably the only reason to ask for a name change.
>>
>
> You mean trademark? :-)
>
Noel
+1, indeed
Deepal
> I checked it out, seems cleanly packaged, with incubation notice and
> licenses.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Paul
>
> On 9/27/06, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The Woden developer community has voted on and approved a proposal to
>> release Woden 1.0.0 M6 (Miles
27 matches
Mail list logo
