Marshall Schor wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures
and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz .
I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user
documentation. The "UIMA Documentation Overview" in
uima-
Henri Yandell wrote:
[snip]
Any thoughts on the below?
[snip]
the important part is that the code was developed outside of the ASF
SVN repository and the ASF public mailing lists.
I struggle with what that really means. Code is technically developed in
IDEs on people's machines, not on m
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the only caveat being DB is feeling a little bit umbrella-ish these days.
I've seen this comment a couple of times in the last week or so, but I
don't really understand what it's trying to say.
What makes an Apache project "umbrella-ish"?
How does "umbrella-ish" r
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Geir,
>
> I don't think there is any contradiction between your post and what
> Mike was saying. If you look at the thread context, we are still
> talking about how to move with the incubation sponsorship.
>
> More to the point, I was the one who started the confusion w
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> On Feb 1, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>
>>> How should the disclaimer be associated?
>>
>>
>> Well, this is a bit of an issue. Why are the plain jars available? To
>> allow automated downloads by Maven? I have an issue with that, since it
>> could al
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> As you can see from the above table, the AjaxTk 2nd proposal was
> entirely composed of # people, mentor included. AFAIK, that's
> something that never happened in the Incubator and something I'm
> keen not to see happening as a precedent.
Actually Derby had all IBM committe
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>> I'm happy to take care of web site updates on Jeremy's list below.
>>
>> Brian, can we move forward with graduation-related work, such as
>> requesting that infrastructure move derby's svn repo and committer
>> karmas from infrastructure to db? Or
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>
>
>>So please vote on graduating Derby to a sub-project of Apache DB.
>
>
> Passed with eleven (11) +1 votes (including one ++1 vote :-)
>
> Three (3) members of the Incubator PMC voted +1 (Noel, Gei
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> So please vote on graduating Derby to a sub-project of Apache DB.
Passed with eleven (11) +1 votes (including one ++1 vote :-)
Three (3) members of the Incubator PMC voted +1 (Noel, Geir, Roy)
Three (3) members of the DB-PMC voted +1 (Brian, Geir, Henn
Noel said that rather than hassling the Incubator PMC members for
release approval, we should just graduate!
So please vote on graduating Derby to a sub-project of Apache DB.
The developer community continues get the Apache Way and its diversity
has increased since the last graduation vote (where
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> ++1. It's great to see Derby's progress as a community!
Thanks for following up and the compliment!!
> I'd encourage your ppmc, as you stop to celebrate the completion
> of this milestone, to look around at the other contributors to the
> latest efforts, and consid
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 04:30 PM 7/15/2005, Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>>Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>>Hello Incubator,
>>>
>>>On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request
>>>permission to post the files you can find here:
>>>
>>>http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/der
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Please vote on making David a committer on the Derby project. The
> derby-ppmc believe David will be a great benefit to Derby.
>
> [ ] - Add David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Derby
> committer
Passed with 16 +1 votes, no other
The Incubator policy page is very clear that:
'Podlings are, by definition, not yet fully accepted as part of the
Apache Software Foundation. Podling web sites MUST include a clear
disclaimer on their website and in all documentation stating that they
are in incubation.'
http://incubator.apache.
-0700
From: Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Derby Development
To: derby-dev
Please vote on making David a committer on the Derby project. The
derby-ppmc believe David will be a great benefit to Derby.
[ ] - Add David Van Couvering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Der
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Please vote on making Øyvind a committer on the Derby project. The
> derby-ppmc believe Øyvind will be a great benefit to Derby.
>
> [ ] - Add Øyvind Bakksjø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Derby committer
>
Vote passes, fourteen (14) +1 votes, no
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> Please vote on making Bernt a committer on the Derby project. The
> derby-ppmc believe Bernt will be a great benefit to Derby.
>
> [ ] - Add Bernt M. Johnsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a Derby committer
>
Vote passes, fourteen (14) +1 votes, no o
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 05:42 AM 7/7/2005, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>Right now I see this process as a mixed bag that is made much
>>harder by the disjoint between the incubator PMC and the incubated
>>projects' private lists. I wonder what would happen if we made
>>a single "[EMAIL PROT
One more commiter vote notification to general@incubator.apache.org
Dan.
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Add Øyvind Bakksjø as a Derby committer
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:50:17 -0700
From: Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Derby Development
To: der
Derby committer
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:33:24 -0700
From: Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Derby Development
To: derby-dev
Please vote on making Bernt a committer on the Derby project. The
derby-ppmc believe Bernt will be a great benefit to Derby.
[ ] - Add Bernt M. John
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Ken expressed concern:
>
> Please note that the text did offer either approach as acceptable, and up to
> each PMC, so I am not entirely sure of the real point of contention. If the
> PMC prefers one over the other, use it.
But only one is described as '... Best Practi
Richard Feit wrote:
> I've been a bit hung up on the idea that since Derby has done several
> "official releases" from within the Incubator (e.g., Version 10.0.2.1 at
> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html#Official+Releases
> ), Beehive should be able to do the same thing. I thi
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> Here is my opinion on the whole release issue, which has not changed
> in 18 months since the first big discussion of releases and incubation
> branding.
[snip]
Maybe folks are confused by this sentence in the 'Minimum Exit
Requirements' section.
http://incubator.apache.
Brian McCallister wrote:
>> On Apr 22, 2005, at 2:16 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
>> Pity my Derby internals proposal was rejected by Apachecon Europe :-)
>
> Would you consider doing it as a BOF if you will be there? I would like
> to attend it!
Yes, I'll lea
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> If there really is still just one outside committer, then in my opinion
> the community has not yet passed that test; and rather than coding,
> those who care about that project should be advocating its existance to
> others, giving presentations at conferences,
Pity my
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
[snip]
> We have the same problems as Derby within the Jackrabbit project,
> though not only did we *start* with a far more diverse set of
> committers, we actively encouraged new folks to take responsibility
> for their own contributions. Nevertheless, it is quite clear to
> Hi all, I love Derby, but for unit testing it's just too slow. We used
> to use HSQLDB before iBATIS joined ASF, but I switched to Derby it
> because I wasn't sure if HSQLDB was compatible with the ASF license.
There has been some discussion of adding a lower durability option to
Derby, which w
27 matches
Mail list logo
