Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > +1 > > Thks > Amol > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > > +1! > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gr

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

+1 (not binding) On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 > On 10 Sep 2015 08:11, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:37PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > Following the discussion earlier: > > >http://s.apache.org/TE6 > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

gt; >> under the Apache License, version 2.0. We know of no legal > >> encumberments that would inhibit the transfer of source code to the > >> ASF. > >> > >> == External Dependencies == > >> > >> Runtime dependencies: > >> * gimli (BSD) >

Re: [DISCUSS] HAWQ Incubation Proposal

Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the HAWQ ASF project or as a child one? On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ... > > == External Dependencies ==... > > There's some GPL/LGPL