Moin Moin [1],
my name is Christian Lippka and I work on the donnated code base since 1998
when I was hired by StarDivision which was then consumed by Sun and later
bought by Oracle. Oracle is also my current employer. I am here as an
individual,
so everything I do and say is based on my own
Hi Steve,
Am 07.06.2011 15:27, schrieb Steve Loughran:
[...]
The issue with corporate reassignments is that everyone just
"vanishes". They get reassigned, and go away. In OSS, individuals tend
to drift off, go onto what else interests them, or whatever. The
turnover/year may be the same,
Hi Steve,
Am 07.06.2011 15:27, schrieb Steve Loughran:
[...]
The issue with corporate reassignments is that everyone just
"vanishes". They get reassigned, and go away. In OSS, individuals tend
to drift off, go onto what else interests them, or whatever. The
turnover/year may be the same,
Hi Thorsten,
Am 07.06.2011 11:09, schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Simon Brouwer wrote:
The real question is whether anything essential is missing that Oracle
can't supply and that is very difficult to replace.
If you re-read Christian's mail, the answer to both is "yes". And
another remark: given t
Am 06.06.2011 12:02, schrieb Christian Lohmaier
[...]
- Sam Ruby
raw numbers:
wc -l repo.lst sorted_ooo.lst
69076 repo.lst
39616 sorted_ooo.lst
So even calling this "seems to include the full repo" and that even
twice is either with malicious intent, or with no clue. Christ
Am 06.06.2011 00:28, schrieb Simon Brouwer:
Op 5-6-2011 19:19, Christian Lippka schreef:
Hi Ralph,
Am 05.06.2011 18:46, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I posted a similar statement yesterday. Personally, I think the
traffic
on this list has settled
Am 05.06.2011 21:34, schrieb André Schnabel:
Hi,
Am 05.06.2011 20:24, schrieb Simon Phipps:
I'm more interested in the list of files from the Hg repository that
are NOT in that list. I gotta believe it is non-zero, so what are
they, and how much of a problem will that be?
I've been discussing
Hi Simon,
Am 05.06.2011 20:58, schrieb Simon Phipps:
While the extensions in particular are a concern (plenty of us will be
horrified to lose the Presenter Console from Impress for example), it's also
important to get the work that was in progress internal to Sun on core code
features when the p
Hi Ralph,
Am 05.06.2011 18:46, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I posted a similar statement yesterday. Personally, I think the traffic
on this list has settled down a lot in the last 24 hours and is now
focusing in on topics more relevant to this list. Bu
Hi Sam,
thank you for the list. From a first glance it looks like that this is
exactly the
same set of sources that is already available in the OpenOffice.org
repository.
I do not want to imply that this is too much or too little, just a FYI
for those interested
and to lazy to compare for the
Am 03.06.2011 14:52, schrieb Benson Margulies:
Here is a thread for some infrastructure implications of an OO podling.
Things to note:
1. OO is very large.
2. OO is a good-old C++ giant. It's not 'build once, run anywhere'. It
has to be built many times in many configurations to maintain
regre
Am 02.06.2011 22:40, schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
We already had subversion for some time as the repository for the main
code and it didn't work well for a project this size.
Tangential to the responses you've already received, I'm curious as to the
problems you experienced with Subversion. Our inf
view both git or mercurial should be fine and preferred over subversion.
Regards,
Christian Lippka
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
