++1
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Dan Peterson wrote:
> I'm quite supportive.
>
> -Dan
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:04 -0500, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > > Hi folks
> > >
> > > FYI, the Shindig community has successfully voted for gradu
s not used.
-- Chris
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Chabot wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-041/org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.1-BETA2-incubating
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-041/org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.1-BETA2-incubating/shindig-1.1-BETA2-incubating-php.tar.gz
>
> has a similar problem -- it ships rhino but the MPL and such are not
> in the
Hey guys,
Great looking proposal!
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> The Wookie proposal has my high interest, especially from the bridging POV
> between W3C Widgets and Google Gadgets.
It seems there's a few mixed terminologies here, so in interest of making
sure we're all
Just to clarify:
Our initial release deployment actually included a shindig-sources archive,
however because the PHP release *is* the source archive (the source is the
binary since it's still a scripting language), and the jar's already
included the source code too, we thought this would be confus
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> OK, it just looked odd to have it at the same level as the README, N & L
> files.
Agreed, however there's also a lot of people who just ftp the files to the
their shared webhost and expect it to work, so to try to make it work for
the most basi
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
> NOTICE file says 2008.
Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
archives are created they will be updated too.
>
> Not sure the .htaccess file
+1 from a shindig ppmc, social site is an awesome product that fills various
needs (from being a demo of how to use shindig, to use in large scale
projects).
And as it depends on shindig, having it become an Apache project
Just-Makes-Sense(Tm).
-- Chris
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jamey
Ps, Hans De Goede has a bit more experience with several distro's then me
and offered to help out too, i've added him to the CC list.
-- Chris
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Chris Chabot wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
> robe
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> we should probably try to kick start some incubator documentation on
> this. would you be willing to lend a hand?
>
I don't think I'll have the time to be the driving force behind it, but
would be mo
I don't have any specific experience with getting apache projects into linux
distro's, however I have in the past done some package management for RedHat
and Fedora.
The answer is usually pretty simple: Package it in the distro's format (deb,
rpm, etc) following the guidelines of that distro, and
This might or might not be relevant, but there is at least one
very-much-alive PHP community within the Apache incubator: the PHP version
of Shindig (http://incubator.apache.org/shindig/ &
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/trunk/php/).
While we haven't been able to attract a lot of
Yep it does indeed, thanks!
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:33 PM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Chris Chabot wrote:
> > >
> > > Should we file a ticket or is this being looked at already?
> >
> > "No"
We reported feb, april and may of this year, and were living under the
assumption our next reporting moment would be further in the future.
Our apologies.
Shindig is working on this now and we'll update the wiki asap, once we
had the chance to bounce it of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Chr
14 matches
Mail list logo
