+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Bruno
On 11/5/18 10:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
on behalf of Sharding-Sphere community, I'd like to call
a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. The full
proposal is available on the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal
an
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Bruno
On 05/31/2017 06:03 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
Hi folks!
I'm calling a vote to accept "Livy" into the Apache Incubator.
The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LivyProposal
For additional context,
+1 (non-binding)
On 11/10/2016 08:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on
accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator.
[ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator
[ ] +0 Abstain.
[ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ into the Apache Inc
+1 (non-binding)
On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago.
Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to
change name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache
iota" (the greek le
+1 (non-binding)
On 01/16/2016 12:12 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
Hi,
The iota proposal [1] (initially Tempo) was proposed about 6 weeks ago.
Because of the naming conflict that would have likely required to
change name at graduation, the project name was changed to "Apache
iota" (the greek le
On 12/31/2013 12:39 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
Incubator-
Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept DataFu as a
new Incubator project.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DataFuProposal, and is also included
below.
Vote is open for at least 96
On 12/05/2013 01:43 PM, Stack wrote:
Discussion of the Phoenix proposal has settled since its original
posting on November 7th. Feedback has been incorporated.
Let us now move to a vote.
Should Phoenix become an Apache incubator project?
[] +1 Accept Phoenix into the Incubator
[] +0 Don't car
+1 (non binding)
On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
Incubator podling.
Voting
On 09/12/2013 12:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Discussion about the Storm proposal has subsided, issues raised now
seemingly resolved.
I'd like to call a vote to accept Storm as a new Incubator podling.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StormPropo
+1 (non-binding)
On 07/26/2013 12:52 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
Incubator-
Following the discussion earlier this week, I'm calling a vote to accept
Samza as a new Incubator project.
The proposal draft is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SamzaProposal,
and is also included below. It
+1 (non binding)
On 03/14/2013 09:47 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
Apache CloudStack entered the Incubator in April of 2012. We have made
significant progress with the project since moving over to Apache.
We have 31 committers and 13 PPMC members listed on our status page at [1],
not including the 8
On 03/02/2013 03:35 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Provisionr into the Apache
Incubator.
The vote will close on March 8.
[] +1 Accept Provisionr into the Apache incubator
[] +0 Don't care.
[] -1 Don't accept Provisionr into the incubator because...
F
On 10/10/2012 09:37 AM, kishore g wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call a vote for accepting Helix for incubation in the
Apache Incubator. I have pasted the full proposal below.
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Bruno
-
To unsubscribe, e-
ite tomwh...@apache.org
* Alejandro Abdelnurt...@apache.org
* Andrew Bayer aba...@apache.org
* Konstantin Boudnikc...@apache.org
* Stephen Chu s...@apache.org
* Bruno Mahébm...@apac
First, thank you very much for taking the time to write a thoughtful reply.
On 05/08/2012 02:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>> ...
>
> It seems that we're talking about this location:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incuba
On 05/05/2012 01:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'm just wondering about where do I find for example the licensing
> metadata for example for the files in
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/bigtop/bigtop-0.3.0-incubating/repos/fedora16/hive/
>
> Or am I just missing something obvious? Like that
On 05/08/2012 05:50 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this pres
On 05/08/2012 05:50 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
> I don't understand the BigTop use cases
Perhaps this pres
Hi,
Please see my reply inline.
On 05/03/2012 04:00 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>>>
>>> As a mentor of the Bigtop project, I don't see it as acceptable for an
>>> Apache project to distribute binaries of n
On 05/03/2012 08:06 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
>> wrote:
>>> So you are suggesting expanding the charter to include projects not hosted
>>> at Apache?
>>
>> I don't think this is what
On 05/03/2012 11:46 AM, Alan Gates wrote:
> Roman,
>
> I see your point that many Apache projects include non-Apache code in their
> binary distributions. But there is a distinction here. In the case of
> Hadoop and other projects, they bring things such Guava along because they
> need them,
On 03/20/2012 11:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.3.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317841&projectId=12311420
>
> The delta between RC0 and
On 03/20/2012 09:13 PM, Ron Bogdanoff wrote:
> I tried building/testing RC1 today. Question, I am probably doing
> something wrong here, not sure...
>
> Build was ok, can run PI test.
>
> I am trying to run the smoke tests in bigtop-tests/test-artifacts. I
> needed to add a to the pom for
> ht
On 03/10/2012 07:10 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This is the third incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.3.0-incubating.
>
> *** Please download, test, and vote by Friday, March 16
>
> Note that we are voting on the source (tag): release-0.3.0-incubating-RC0
>
> Source tarball, check
On 11/04/2011 02:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by:
> $ mvn -Prelease install
> at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1 and RC2
> and given how cosmetic it is I'd like to think that all the existin
On 08/22/2011 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download, te
imho this is a non issue for this release because:
* A discussion has just started on bigtop-dev mailing list about that
question.
* We don't have any build slaves yet, so no convenience artifacts built
from Apache. So no overlap or conflict can happen today
* This release is focused on getting the
My last patch for centos5 broke openSUSE/Mageia (here lies the troubles
of having different set of VMs at home and at work).
I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't
break anything.
Could we re-cut a rc after that patch?
On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Thi
28 matches
Mail list logo