Re: [VOTE] Graduate Buildr as TLP

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually Daniel K's vote is binding, but that doesn't change the outcome. > > Congratulations! > > Paul > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The vote to approve the graduation

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Buildr as TLP

-binding: * Niklas Gustavsson * Erik Hatcher * Daniel Kulp * Luciano Resende * Carl Trieloff Thank you for your participation and congratulations to the Buildr project for this important milestone! alex On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Alex Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Stonehenge

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Upon thinking about it, and talking with others, I really believe > that Stonehenge had the potential of being an extremely cool > effort. Not only for the code aspects, but even more importantly > the impact it could have

[VOTE] Graduate Buildr as TLP

he Buildr Project: - Assaf Arkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Alex Boisvert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Victor Hugo Borja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Antoine Contal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Matthieu Riou ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Alex Boisvert be and hereby is appoi

Buildr Graduation Feedback

Dear incubator overseers, The Buildr project has been working on a draft board resolution to graduate from the incubator. We've recently held a voteto gauge the support of the community and feedback was all positive. The pro

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread)

+1 (non-binding) On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The ServiceMix podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recommending the attached draft board resolution. [ ] +1 Recommend to the board to establish Apac

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ODE to a Top Level Project

[EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Assaf Arkin([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Alex Boisvert ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Cory Harper([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Davanum Srinivas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Guillaume Nodet( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Lance Wa

Re: Ode / BPEL Donation of BPEL 2.0 Engine

Alright, then I would revise my proposition to: Apache Ode => Merge of PXE, Sybase BPE and Agila BPEL Apache Agila => Merge of Agila workflow and Intalio BPEL4People What do people think about this grouping? alex Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Feb 16, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:

Re: Ode / BPEL Donation of BPEL 2.0 Engine

Bill Flood wrote: >Likewise, human workflow could be built on BPEL I suppose but there are >other languages that might be mapped into an engine as well. At any rate, >keeping the human workflow out of the engine scope is probably worth >thinking about. > > +1. This is what I am proposing. al

Re: Ode / BPEL Donation of BPEL 2.0 Engine

This raises an interesting point. Is the goal of the project to produce a BPEL engine? If so, then we could have separation between BPEL (processes) and workflow (human tasks). I think this would help modularity and clarify project focus. In order words, workflow-related pieces could go int

Re: Ode / BPEL Donation of BPEL 2.0 Engine

I agree, we'll need to set both codebases in the repository so we can start the merge process. In parallel, we also need to determine what we want from the resulting merge so we can work together in building the new engine. alex James Strachan wrote: > On 16 Feb 2006, at 16:41, Ismael Ghalimi