Dear all,
As for the question of the “Broader Contributing Members”, they do not
qualify as initial committers as they have provided feedback / contributed
on the broader scope of ResilientDB, so we suggest either removing them or
keeping them in a separate category. I prefer keeping them as a sep
Start from my own +1 (non-binding)
Looking forward votes from IPMC members ~
Thanks,
Cheng Pan
> On Oct 7, 2023, at 13:29, Cheng Pan wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Celeborn (Incubating)
> 0.3.1-incubating-rc3
>
> The Apache Celeborn community has voted o
Unlike the Linux kernel, we use the dev or main branch from the
official upstream repo to accept the PRs from the developer; we do the
release work on the other branch in the same repo. We don't use
another forked repo to keep those changes first. It will confuse the
contributor in finding the ri
I still have a question for the “Broader Contributing Members”: do we
treat them as initial committers?
It makes sense that we keep track of all the contributors on the
project website so that no one will be surprised by the long list of
initial committers.
An extensive initial committer list does
Note that 3 of those +1s (me, Calvin, JB) are binding because they are
Incubator PMC members, 2 are not (Bertil, Leonard).
3 binding +1s is sufficient for the vote to pass.
Congratulations!
Julian
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:49 AM Bertil Chapuis wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> The vote for Apach
