Hi,
+1, I'm also interesting by this project and I would be happy to help as
mentor if needed.
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 04/08/2020 à 19:33, Kevin Ratnasekera a écrit :
> Hi Easen,
>
> +1, Having worked in a similar domain so far, I have to say this is an
> interesting project. If
I am sorry, I re-learned the information about the release, and there are
indeed some problems with this release.
1. The binary package is indeed required in svn.
2. The license and notice files in the release-docs directory are not required
in the source tar, because the source tar does not con
Hi all,
Apache MXNet received a donation, MShadow [1], which assimilates this previous
3rdparty dependency into MXNet code base.
The IP clearance form can be found at
https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/mxnet-mshadow.html
Secretary has confirmed that SGA is received [2]. Committers of thi
Questions.
1. Why I can't find the binary tar in the svn? But at the same time, you
have one uploaded in the maven staging?
2. Why does the source tar include the `release-docs/LICENSE` and NOTICE
3. Why doesn't the LICENSE in the staging tar(
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orga
Hi Justin,
I’ve asked Doris to either get the report together in the next 24 hours or to
report next month.
Regards,
Dave
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Podling report are due today and currently we’re waiting on the following
> projects.
>
> Annotator
> Blu
On 05/08/2020 00.51, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Podling report are due today and currently we’re waiting on the following
projects.
Annotator
BlueMarlin
Doris
Liminal
Livy
NLPCraft
Pinot
S2Graph
SDAP
Sedona
Training
Tuweni
Warble
Warble effectively retired/went dormant, FWIW.
Don't expect a re